PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3054716

Swallowing physiology and pathophysiology.

Abstract

Many disturbances in oropharyngeal physiology can result in aspiration. Poor tongue movement in chewing or in the oral swallow can cause food to fall into the pharynx and into the open airway before swallowing. A delay in triggering the pharyngeal swallow can result in food falling into the airway during the delay when the airway is open. Reduced peristalsis in the pharynx, whether unilateral or bilateral, will cause residue in the pharynx after the swallow that can fall or be inhaled into the airway. Reduced laryngeal elevation causes food to catch at the top of the airway. This residual food is then easily aspirated during the inhalation after the swallow. Reduced laryngeal closure may result in food penetrating the larynx during the pharyngeal swallow. Cricopharyngeal dysfunction can result in material remaining in the pyriform sinus, with aspiration of material into the airway after the swallow. Aspiration may also occur because food returns or is refluxed from the stomach or esophagus back into the pharynx. Each of these causes of aspiration can occur in a variety of patients, including those with neurologic impairment or structural damage. Each of these causes of aspiration has a different treatment. Thus, accurate and in-depth evaluation of swallowing anatomy and physiology in the oral-pharyngeal region as well as in the esophagus is necessary in successful re-establishment of oral nutrition in the dysphagic patient. Currently, such thorough evaluation requires radiographic graphic techniques, that is, videofluoroscopy and often manometry as well.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Logemann. 1988. Swallowing physiology and pathophysiology.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3054716/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Analysis of respiratory complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: preliminary observation of persistent aspiration risk.

Minimally invasive (MI) esophageal resection (ER) has the theoretical advantage of reduced postoperative complications compared with standard ER. However, the impact of MIER on rates and severity of pulmonary complications is unclear. Four patients underwent laparoscopic gastroesophageal mobilization and resection followed by gastric pull-up and cervical esophageal anastomosis (MIER). Videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) assessed pharyngolaryngeal function postoperatively. All postoperative complications were documented. Each MIER was completed successfully without intraoperative complications. Mean operative time was 4.3 +/- 2 h. Postoperatively, VFSS detected laryngeal penetration, vocal cord paralysis, and/or aspiration in three patients, two of whom experienced severe respiratory complications. MIER patients are susceptible to aspiration, likely due to transient denervation of the pharynx and laryngeal structures. Following MIER, aggressive pulmonary toilet and aspiration precautions are emphasized to reduce pulmonary complications. Furthermore, serial evaluation of deglutition is encouraged to guide the safe and appropriate resumption of oral feeding.

Deglutition↗

Technological insights: combined impedance manometry for esophageal motility testing-current results and further implications.

This review focuses on current aspects of the novel technology of combined impedance manometry for esophageal motility testing. It presents methodological features, summarizes current results and discusses implications for further research. The combined technique assesses simultaneously bolus transport and associated peristalsis, thus allowing detailed analysis of the relationships between bolus transit and esophageal motility. Recent studies demonstrate that combined impedance manometry provides important additional information about esophageal motility as compared to conventional manometry: (1) monitoring of bolus transport patterns, (2) calculation of bolus transit parameters, (3) evaluation of bolus clearance, (4) monitoring of swallow associated events such as air movement and reflux, and (5) investigation of the relationships between bolus transit and LES relaxation. Studies with healthy subjects have identified several useful parameters for comprehensive assessment of eosphageal function. These parameters were found to be pathological in patients with classical achalasia, mild GERD, and ineffective esophageal motility. The technology of combined impedance manometry provides an important new tool for esophageal function testing, advancing both clinical and basic research. However, several important issues remain to be standardized to make the technique suitable for widely clinical use.

Deglutition↗

How important is inadvertent ingestion of hazardous substances at work?

Much is known about human exposure to workplace hazardous substances by inhalation and from skin contact, but there has been little systematic research into ingestion of hazardous substances used at work. This review attempts to identify whether inadvertent ingestion of hazardous substances is an important route of exposure in the workplace and examines possible methods that could be used to quantify ingestion exposure. A number of papers highlight jobs and substances where inadvertent ingestion may be important, typically through case reports or from a theoretical analysis. These scenarios involve exposure to some metals or metal compounds, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, some infectious agents, unsealed radioactive sources and some high molecular weight allergens. In total we estimate that about 4.5 million workers in the UK could have some regular non-trivial intake of hazardous substances by inadvertent ingestion. A conceptual analysis of inadvertent ingestion exposure highlights the role of hand-to-mouth and object-to-mouth events as the primary exposure processes. Two exposure 'compartments' are defined: the peri-oral area (i.e. the area of skin around the outside of the mouth) and the oral cavity. Several options are highlighted for exposure-related measurements, including peri-oral wipes, saliva samples, mouth-rinse samples, hand-wipes and under-nail scrapings. Further research is necessary to define which measurements may be most informative. Human behaviour has a key role in determining inadvertent ingestion exposure. For example, some people are habitual nail biters or repeatedly touch their mouth, both of which will increase the chance of ingesting contaminants on their hands. The frequency that people touch their face is dependant on the circumstances of their work and probably the degree of psychological stress they are under. A proper understanding of the importance of these factors will help in designing interventions to reduce the risks from ingesting hazardous substances at work. When making inhalation or dermal exposure measurements we recommend that details of personal behaviours should be recorded so that some estimate of ingestion risks can be inferred. It is possible that inadvertent ingestion of hazardous substances at work may become more important as employers put more emphasis on controlling inhalation and dermal exposures. Further research is necessary to ensure that risk reduction strategies for inadvertent ingestion of hazardous substances are appropriate and effective.

Deglutition↗