PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3072366

[Ambulatory ocular surgery].

Abstract

Out-patient ocular surgery exists in numerous countries and is currently making its debut in France. The authors note, from a series of 286 out-patients lens implantation operations, that the rate of complications does not significantly differ from that of in-patient procedures. These figures corroborate the results published in the United-States. The procedures applies only to motivated patients in good health and non-handicapped who well understand instructions. The selection of patients is done with the concurrence of the anesthesiologist. The anesthesia is local, occasionally preceded by a suitable sedative. The procedure takes place in an adapted surgical center of which there are several types. The check-out of the patient is within one to four hours after the operation. The constraints posed by equipment and facilities are significant since the responsibility dwells at all times with the surgeon. Caution must be exercised in all phases. The economic advantages of out-patient ocular surgery are not obvious in the current managerial context all the more so because the investment (in equipment and facilities) is costly. Nonetheless, a desired positive secondary effect would be the freeing of hospital beds for other uses. As a parallel, out-patient ocular surgery responds to a new patients demand to be treated rapidly and in an up-to-date manner (both medically and in terms of reception, waiting periods and check-out). The quality of the all procedure is increased.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D A Lebuisson, P Delbecque, L Leroy, J F Montin. 1988. [Ambulatory ocular surgery].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3072366/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗