PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3129441

Is valproate monotherapy a practical possibility in chronically uncontrolled epilepsy?

Abstract

In a prospective open study of 20 male epileptic residents of a mental handicap institution, polytherapy was gradually reduced to valproate monotherapy in 18 subjects. In terms of seizure frequency this was significantly disadvantageous but when carbamazepine was added or substituted, seizure control improved significantly. Drugs with documented adverse effects on cognitive function such as phenobarbitone and phenytoin were phased out. In the 18 subjects who achieved valproate monotherapy, no association between serum levels and seizure control could be demonstrated. Adverse effects of valproate were pancreatitis and thrombocytopenia; in one subject thrombocytopenia appeared to be associated with levels in the toxic range but in six other subjects 'toxic' levels of valproate did not give rise to any clinically detectable toxic signs. There was no instance of tremor or weight gain. It was concluded that, in the population studied (institutionalized patients with chronically uncontrolled seizures) valproate monotherapy was inappropriate but carbamazepine with or without valproate was a better option. Phasing out phenytoin and phenobarbitone was successful. Valproate serum levels did not contribute significantly to the conduct of the study; no general relationship between valproate serum levels and either seizure control or toxicity could be demonstrated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D J Armour, G B Veitch. 1988. Is valproate monotherapy a practical possibility in chronically uncontrolled epilepsy?. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.1988.tb00506.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide (zonegran) in the treatment of essential tremor.

Medical therapy for essential tremor (ET), a common movement disorder, is often inadequate. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS), an antiepileptic agent, in treating ET. Twenty patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years) with ET were randomized to receive ZNS or placebo. ZNS was initiated at a dosage of 100 mg/day and escalated to 200 mg/day at day 14. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale at baseline and days 14 and 28, as well as the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-C) scale at day 28. At endpoint, subjects assigned to ZNS were taking a mean dosage of 160 +/- 50 mg/day. There were no significant improvements in the FTM total score or its subsections. Tremor amplitude as assessed by accelerometry significantly improved in the ZNS group compared to the placebo group at endpoint relative to baseline (-0.50 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.79 m/s(2); P = 0.03). On the CGI-C, 60% (n = 6) of patients in the ZNS group felt that their tremor was unchanged, while the remaining patients felt that their tremor was "minimally improved." Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients taking ZNS discontinued the study due to side effects (fatigue, headache, paresthesias) while taking 100 mg per day. ZNS did not provide significant improvements in clinical rating scales at study endpoint compared to placebo and was only modestly well tolerated. ZNS was effective in reducing tremor amplitude as measured by accelerometry.

Anticonvulsants↗