PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3134835

COBRA: implications for emergency medicine.

Abstract

The potential impact of COBRA is staggering and must be confronted. The ultimate scope and effects will take shape quickly. Federal regulations will provide some of the rules, but the most important definitions under the law will develop in court. Because of a lack of understanding hospitals may not have been in compliance with COBRA's strict terms since August 1986 and may only become educated on COBRA through the legal process. Currently, one COBRA lawsuit has been filed in the Chicago court system, and at least one physician group in California has paid a $25,000 fine for COBRA violations. Litigation in the initial phase of COBRA is likely as most hospitals continue to be unaware of the implications of COBRA legislation. EDs, emergency medical services programs, and interhospital transport programs must begin an immediate effort to examine and develop policies to comply with COBRA. Without an effective educational, compliance, and risk management effort, any emergency medical services program or hospital may become a defendant under COBRA legislation. Delays in understanding and implementing the requirements of COBRA may adversely affect the health care system rather than improve it.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S A Frew, W R Roush, K LaGreca. 1988. COBRA: implications for emergency medicine.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80565-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10.

OBJECTIVE: Reliability of diagnoses coding is essential for the use of routine data in a national health care system. The present investigation compares reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10 between three groups of coding subjects. METHOD: One hundred and eighteen students coded 15 diagnoses lists, 27 medical managers from hospitals 34 discharge letters, and 13 coding specialists 12 discharge letters. Agreement in principal diagnosis was assessed using Cohen's Kappa and the fraction of coincidences over the number of pairs, agreement for the full set of diagnoses with a previously developed measure p(om). RESULTS: Kappa values were fair (managers) or moderate (coders) for terminal codes with 0.27 and 0.42 (agreement 29.2% versus 46.8%), substantial for the chapter level with 0.71 and 0.72 (agreement 78.3% versus 80.8%). p(om) was lower for the full set of diagnoses than for principal diagnoses, for example in case of managers with 0.21 versus 0.29 for terminal codes. Best results were achieved by students coding diagnoses lists. In summary, the results are remarkably lower than in earlier publications. CONCLUSION: The refinement of the ICD-10 accompanied by innumerous coding rules has established a complex environment that leads to significant uncertainties even for experts. Use of coded data for quality management, health care financing, and health care policy requires a remarkable simplification of ICD-10 to receive a valid image of health care reality.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗