PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3138723

Immunofluorescence: quantitative considerations.

Abstract

The combination of the specificity of the antigen-antibody interaction with the sensitivity of fluorescence detection and quantitation yields one of the most widely applicable analytical tools in cell biology. Immunofluorescence (IF) signals can be measured with microscopes or flow cytometers. Choice for either of the two systems depends on the type of preparation (cells, tissues, etc.), on the type of required information (morphology, distribution, quantitation) and on the number and quality of the samples. In IF a choice has to be made for the most appropriate fluorochromes, reagents, equipment and preparative procedure, respectively, the right balance between lightsource, objective, eye pieces and filters should be sought in microscopy as well as in flow cytometry. The quantitative influence is reported of each of these variables on the eventual fluorescence intensity. New developments are appearing in IF technology. These include laser-scan microscopy, point-addressable optical sensors, phosphorescence microscopy and more sophisticated flow cytometers that allow some morphometry. The possible uses of these systems is discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J J Haaijman. 1988. Immunofluorescence: quantitative considerations.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3138723/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Ultrastructure of Staphylococcus aureus as revealed by microwave fixation.

The ultrastructure of the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus was examined at electron microscopic level using new chemical fixation techniques during microwave irradiation and the results obtained were compared with those obtained by other conventional techniques. By using microwave fixation the concentric circular or zipper-like structure was observed in the cell wall. This structure was observed also with the spray-freeze-etch technique but not in thin section of the cells chemically fixed by conventional technique. For chemical fixative, glutaraldehyde is more advantageous than OsO4 as a concomitant fixative during microwave irradiation and postfixation by OsO4 is unnecessary and rather harmful for the preservation of the ultrastructure. The function of the observed structure is briefly discussed.

Fixatives