PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3164232

Postradiation multicentric osteosarcoma.

Abstract

The oncogenic effects of radiation are well-established. Osteosarcomas and fibrosarcomas are the two most common histologic types of secondary sarcoma. In this article a case of postradiation osteosarcoma is presented in which four discrete foci of sarcomatous transformation have occurred in the tibia and fibula after irradiation for a rhabdomyosarcoma of the calf 8 years earlier. A review of the literature reveals no similar case. Although synchronous, multifocal osteosarcoma without prior radiation has been described, this case differs in clinical, radiographic, and pathologic features; it best fits the description of postradiation multicentric osteosarcoma.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Tillotson, A Rosenberg, M Gebhardt, D I Rosenthal. 1988-07-01. Postradiation multicentric osteosarcoma.. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19880701)62%3A1%3C67%3A%3Aaid-cncr2820620114%3E3.0.co%3B2-q

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The WHO Histological Typing of Odontogenic Tumours. A commentary on the Second Edition.

This article introduces the revised World Health Organization (WHO) classification of odontogenic tumors and jaw cysts and certain bone lesions that either are peculiar to the jaws or have distinctive features in that location. The new and revised classification is compared with the previous version, the reasons for the changes are outlined, and reference is made to a number of newly characterized lesions that have been included.

Bone Neoplasms

[MR imaging of bone metastasis].

One hundred and three patients with known malignancy and suspected bone metastasis underwent magnetic resonance imaging. In 93%, the metastatic lesions, detected both on plain films and radionuclide bone scans, showed decreased signal intensity on T1-weighted images and increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images. All lesions, except one lesion showing much blastic change on plain films, showed contrast enhancement with Gd-DTPA administration. Although further investigation is needed, a correlation between the type of primary malignancy and the signal intensity of the metastatic lesion is suggested. Among 312 metastatic lesions detected by MR imaging, 272 lesions (87%) and 134 lesions (40%) were also detected by radionuclide bone scans and plain films, respectively. In five cases, MR imaging clearly revealed the lesion compressing the spinal cord, which helped us formulate a therapeutic plan. We conclude that MR imaging is the most sensitive examination for detecting bone metastasis and is necessary for planning treatment.

Bone Neoplasms