PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3186084

Improved sensitivity in bone scintigraphy using quantitative spinal profile analysis.

Abstract

Full-length skeletal scintiscans were acquired onto a data processor in a series of 256 X 256 matrices. A series of interactive computer programs enables the operator to select profiles down the spine and to standardize them by interpolation to a standard length and by normalization to a given count level. The counts within any section of a profile can then be calculated and the profile examined for any significant deviation from a reference 'normal' curve. In a study of 68 patients, 66% of the spinal profiles were judged abnormal, compared with 26% of scans assessed by visual inspection alone. Of 14 patients with positive profiles and negative or equivocal visually assessed scans, 11 had developed metastases within 14 months of the scan. All five patients with positive profile and raised alkaline phosphatase have died of metastatic disease. The technique appears to increase the sensitivity of bone scintigraphy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Parker, G C Hart. 1988. Improved sensitivity in bone scintigraphy using quantitative spinal profile analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-198809000-00005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The WHO Histological Typing of Odontogenic Tumours. A commentary on the Second Edition.

This article introduces the revised World Health Organization (WHO) classification of odontogenic tumors and jaw cysts and certain bone lesions that either are peculiar to the jaws or have distinctive features in that location. The new and revised classification is compared with the previous version, the reasons for the changes are outlined, and reference is made to a number of newly characterized lesions that have been included.

Bone Neoplasms

[MR imaging of bone metastasis].

One hundred and three patients with known malignancy and suspected bone metastasis underwent magnetic resonance imaging. In 93%, the metastatic lesions, detected both on plain films and radionuclide bone scans, showed decreased signal intensity on T1-weighted images and increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images. All lesions, except one lesion showing much blastic change on plain films, showed contrast enhancement with Gd-DTPA administration. Although further investigation is needed, a correlation between the type of primary malignancy and the signal intensity of the metastatic lesion is suggested. Among 312 metastatic lesions detected by MR imaging, 272 lesions (87%) and 134 lesions (40%) were also detected by radionuclide bone scans and plain films, respectively. In five cases, MR imaging clearly revealed the lesion compressing the spinal cord, which helped us formulate a therapeutic plan. We conclude that MR imaging is the most sensitive examination for detecting bone metastasis and is necessary for planning treatment.

Bone Neoplasms