PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3260396

Proportional hazards models for average data for groups.

A J Dobson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In ecological studies it is sometimes tempting to apply statistical models derived from longitudinal studies of individuals to cross-sectional data which may be available only in aggregate form for groups of individuals. This paper examines the assumptions and approximations that are made when average data for groups are used with predictive equations derived for individuals, in particular for the proportional hazards model. It is shown that this method underestimates age-specific hazard functions but that if ratios of hazard functions are used to compare groups then the approach is valid provided that certain plausible conditions hold. A numerical example is given about trends in heart disease mortality in Australia. Group data are available on risk factor levels and mortality. A proportional hazards model derived from the Framingham study is used to estimate the effects on mortality which may be attributed to risk factor changes and the effects attributable to other factors such as improved medical treatment. The interpretation of the results is discussed.

Explore related subjects

AustraliaCoronary DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleModels, TheoreticalRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsStatistics as TopicJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A J Dobson. 1988. Proportional hazards models for average data for groups.. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780070508

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Whole genome characterisation of Australian and New Zealand OsHV-1 'μVar' like variants over time.

Ostreid herpesvirus 1 (OsHV-1) is a major pathogen of Pacific oysters (Magallana gigas), linked to mass mortality events worldwide and presents a substantial threat to global aquaculture. Since 2010, mortality events have been occurring in Pacific oysters within Australia with the cause being an OsHV-1 microvariant highly similar to OsHV-1 μVar first detected in France, 2008. In this study, fifteen OsHV-1 whole genomes were assembled from Australian and New Zealand mortality events, including twelve newly sequenced genomes and three assembled from public datasets. Whole-genome phylogenetic analyses indicate that Australian and New Zealand OsHV-1 isolates form a distinct clade, separate from European and East Asian genomes, and with moderate regional and temporal divergence across the past 14 years. Across the dataset, multiple biologically relevant mutations were observed in genes of known function, including DNA polymerase, ribonucleotide reductase subunits, and apoptosis-related proteins, though most mutations occurred in uncharacterised genes. These findings highlight the limitations of single-gene typing and support the need for whole-genome approaches in understanding OsHV-1 evolution. Critically, the lack of recent whole-genome data, particularly from East and Southeast Asia, restricts the ability to trace viral origins and detect novel variants, underscoring the need for expanded global OsHV-1 genomic surveillance.

Australia↗
PubMed2026

Interest holder-driven research priorities in sexual and reproductive health for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and prioritise sexual and reproductive health research priorities for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults in Australia using a priority setting partnership approach. METHODS: A James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership was conducted with 92 interest holders: 31 youth from migrant and refugee backgrounds and 61 professionals (healthcare providers, researchers, policymakers and community leaders), recruited online and in-person. The priority setting partnership process included a rapid evidence scan, an online uncertainty survey, evidence verification, interim prioritisation and a final consensus workshop. RESULTS: Eighty-three research uncertainties yielded 11 final priorities across four sexual and reproductive health domains: sexual and reproductive health literacy, sexual violence prevention, accessible services and maternal health. A striking divergence emerged between youth and professional priorities only 3 achieved combined high-priority consensus. Youth prioritised a broader range of topics, including abortion access (rated high by youth but low by professionals), while professionals prioritised fewer areas. Two priorities achieved consensus: community-based maternal health support and barriers to reporting gender-based violence. CONCLUSION: This is the first priority setting partnership to identify sexual and reproductive health research priorities for migrant and refugee youth in Australia and to uniquely highlight substantial misalignment between youth and professional priorities. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: These identified priorities provide a foundation for targeted research, culturally responsive policy and more equitable sexual and reproductive health service provision for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults.

Australia↗