PubMed · 3270458
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J L Ferreria. 1988. [Elements which make up a better extraction].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3270458/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Eighty-two patients were treated in a split mouth design with coronal scaling (CS), root planing (RP), modified Widman surgery (MW), and flap with osseous surgery (FO) which were randomly assigned to the various quadrants in the dentition. Following phase I and phase II therapy, the patients received supportive periodontal treatment (SPT) at 3-month intervals for up to 7 years. Clinical attachment level (CAL) was determined initially, post-phase I, post-phase II and prior to each SPT appointment. If a site lost > or = 3 mm of CAL from its baseline, it was classified as a breakdown site. Baselines were the initial exam for sites treated by CS and 10 weeks post-phase II for sites treated by RP, MW, and FO. Data were grouped by probing depth (PD) severity at the initial exam and at post-phase II. The breakdown for CS sites was assessed separately from RP, MW, and FO sites because of different baselines and retreatment protocols. Sites treated by CS had a higher incidence of breakdown than the other therapies through year 1 of SPT. The breakdown incidences/year for RP and MW sites were similar and greater than for FO sites in 1 to 4 mm and 5 to 6 mm PD categories. Breakdown incidence of RP sites was greater than MW sites which was greater than FO sites initially > or = 7 mm. Differences in incidence of breakdown between therapies after recategorizing data by post-phase II PD were the same as above, except no difference was present between RP and MW sites > or = 7 mm. Breakdown incidences were greater in increasing PD severities regardless of when they were categorized. There was no further loss of CAL one year after retreatment in 88% of sites. Patients with higher breakdown incidences tended to be smokers at the initial exam.
Although ostectomy has been proven in numerous studies to be an effective means of reducing pocket depth, some clinicians still question its merits. To determine the efficacy of ostectomy for the treatment of periodontitis, 870 pairs of presurgical and postsurgical radiographs of sites treated by ostectomy were examined. The postsurgical radiographs, taken 5 to 30 years postoperatively, revealed distinct lamina dura and demonstrated that ostectomy is an effective and predictable technique for intercepting the progressive loss of attachment in selected sites with periodontitis.
The effect of unilateral posterior malocclusion on temporomandibular joint intra-articular pathology was studied in sheep. In Group I, osteoarthritic changes were induced in the left temporomandibular joint by gentle scraping of the articular surface (Ishimaru and Goss, 1992). Group II had the same procedures as Group I, with concurrent extraction of all the left maxillary posterior teeth. Group III had a different osteoarthritic precondition in the left temporomandibular joint, allowing synovial fluid to contact the condylar marrow (Ishimaru et al., 1992). Group IV had the same procedure as Group III, with concurrent extraction of all the left maxillary posterior teeth. Group V had unilateral maxillary molar teeth extraction in the left side. At 3 months, the animals were sacrificed and the joints examined histologically. There were no significant differences between normal control joints and those with unilateral tooth extraction (Group V). Similarly the degree of osteoarthritic change was the same between Groups I and II. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were seen between Groups III and IV with tooth extraction increasing the osteoarthritic effects. Hence it was concluded that in sheep, malocclusion had no effect on the normal temporomandibular joint and on one type of experimental osteoarthritis, but accelerated osteoarthritic change in another model.