PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3271529

A rigorous basepair oriented description of DNA structures.

Abstract

We propose new, rigorous definitions for (i) basepair fixed coordinate systems and (ii) the twist, tilt, and roll angles (called tau, t, rho) describing the relative orientation of adjacent basepairs and bases in a pair, in arbitrary DNA structures obtained from x-ray diffraction, 2D NMR, or energy calculations. In contrast to the corresponding angular parameters (tg, theta T, theta R) and coordinate systems introduced by Dickerson and co-workers and currently in use, our angular parameters and coordinate systems, together with a set of three displacement parameters, dx, dy, dz, provide a mathematically correct and general description of DNA conformations at the basepairs and/or base level. For instance, our description is applicable when the DNA structure considered is inherently curved, irregular, and/or does not possess dyad (or pseudodyad) axes. We develop a computationally convenient algorithm for rigorous DNA conformational analysis and apply it to some of the known crystal structures. We establish the connection to the currently used parameters and test the consistency and efficiency of our methodology by reconstructing the Dickerson B dodecamer using only the sequence and the set of parameters obtained from the atomic coordinates. The six parameter (tau, t, rho, dx, dy, dz) basepair level reconstruction is good but not perfect. Perfect reconstruction is obtained when one also considers each base in a basepair (consideration of propeller twist alone is not sufficient). The variation of the rigorous parameters proposed along the sequence is much larger, but their average values agree with fiber and solution data much better than in the case of the currently used set. The results of our analysis do not support Trifonov's AA.TT wedge model for DNA curvature but provide some evidence in favor of the Crothers junction-bend model. We point out some of the limitations of basepair level approaches when applied to DNA structure prediction and quantitative understanding of sequence-dependent variations in structure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D M Soumpasis, C S Tung. 1988. A rigorous basepair oriented description of DNA structures.. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.1988.10506497

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sp1 is essential for p16 expression in human diploid fibroblasts during senescence.

BACKGROUND: p16(INK4a) tumor suppressor protein has been widely proposed to mediate entrance of the cells into the senescent stage. Promoter of p16(INK4a) gene contains at least five putative GC boxes, named GC-I to V, respectively. Our previous data showed that a potential Sp1 binding site, within the promoter region from -466 to -451, acts as a positive transcription regulatory element. These results led us to examine how Sp1 and/or Sp3 act on these GC boxes during aging in cultured human diploid fibroblasts. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Mutagenesis studies revealed that GC-I, II and IV, especially GC-II, are essential for p16(INK4a) gene expression in senescent cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) and ChIP assays demonstrated that both Sp1 and Sp3 bind to these elements and the binding activity is enhanced in senescent cells. Ectopic overexpression of Sp1, but not Sp3, induced the transcription of p16(INK4a). Both Sp1 RNAi and Mithramycin, a DNA intercalating agent that interferes with Sp1 and Sp3 binding activities, reduced p16(INK4a) gene expression. In addition, the enhanced binding of Sp1 to p16(INK4a) promoter during cellular senescence appeared to be the result of increased Sp1 binding affinity, not an alteration in Sp1 protein level. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: All these results suggest that GC- II is the key site for Sp1 binding and increase of Sp1 binding activity rather than protein levels contributes to the induction of p16(INK4a) expression during cell aging.

Base Composition↗

Application of CE for determination of DNA base composition.

DNA base composition expressed as mol% of guanine plus cytosine (% GC) or GC content is a key parameter of bacterial taxonomy and genomic analyses. Direct chemical determination methods such as HPLC as well as indirect methods based on physical properties of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), melting point (T(m)), and buoyant density (B(d)) have been conventionally applied to determine the GC content. However, these methods require relatively large amounts of sample DNA, time, and labor. We have developed a protocol to determine the GC content by fine separation of nucleosides with CZE. Genomic DNAs with known GC content from 23 bacterial strains were determined by CE at the optimized conditions of 27 degrees C, 20 kV in 50 mM of NaHCO(3) (pH 9.0) and 70 mM SDS added. Nucleosides from <1 microg of DNA hydrolyzed with nuclease-P1 and bacterial alkaline phosphatase were separated in a 75 microm wide and 80 cm long silica capillary. The nucleoside peak areas were determined at 254 nm in less than 12 min. The CE-based determination of GC content requires only small amounts of DNA, and thus should be applicable to environmental genomics (metagenomics), as >90% of environmental micro-organisms are nonculturable and produce only small amounts of genomic DNA.

Base Composition↗