PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3310380

[Multiple sclerosis. Risk factors].

Abstract

Hypothetical risk factors in multiple sclerosis are reviewed. So far accumulated data how that the most probable of the risk factors is represented by the morbillivirus group.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N Drăgănescu. [Multiple sclerosis. Risk factors].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3310380/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A sensitive proliferation assay to determine the specific T cell response against HLA-A2.1-binding peptides.

A proliferation assay to detect a specific T cell response against HLA class I-binding peptides is reported. To establish the specificity and sensitivity of the assay we used a synthetic peptide derived from the CMV glycoprotein B containing the HLA-A2.1 ligand motif. Lymphocyte proliferation was measured following culture of PBMC in the presence or absence of peptide by BrdU uptake. Differing culture conditions were compared (cell number, time in culture, peptide concentration, +/- IL-2). A peptide-specific response was detected in 11 of 23 HLA-A2-positive and CMV IgG-positive donors (47.8%), and in 4 of 36 HLA-A2-positive and CMV IgG-negative donors (11.1%, p = 0.019) tested under optimized conditions. None of 22 HLA-A2-negative individuals tested showed a peptide-specific response and the reproducibility was high. Peptide-specific IFN-gamma-secreting T cells could be demonstrated in responding donors with the ELISPOT assay. This proliferation assay may be suitable for monitoring induction of a specific T cell response against known HLA class I-binding peptides following vaccination with tumor or viral antigens.

Antibodies, Viral

Serologic association between human papillomavirus type 16 infection and esophageal cancer in Shaanxi Province, China.

BACKGROUND: The existence of large geographic variations in the prevalence of esophageal cancer in some countries, such as China, indicates that environmental risk factors may be important in the development of this disease. Some studies have implicated genital-mucosal strains of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) in the etiology of this cancer. PURPOSE: We conducted a case-control study in Shaanxi Province, China, an area with a population at high risk for esophageal cancer, to assess the association of this disease with infection by HPV type 16 (HPV16), the most common cancer-associated genital-mucosal HPV type. METHODS: Ninety individuals with esophageal cancer and 121 cancer-free control subjects were identified among the patients in two hospitals in Xi'an, Shaanxi Province. The control subjects were matched to the case patients on the basis of age and sex. Blood specimens were drawn from all study subjects, and serum was isolated by routine methods. The presence of HPV16 antibodies in serum samples was determined by use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that used baculovirus-derived HPV16 virus-like particles as the antigen. A similar ELISA that used bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV1) virus-like particles as the antigen controlled for the specificity of HPV16 seroreactivity. Data from the HPV16 and the BPV1 assays were normalized with respect to results obtained in each assay with a control serum of known HPV16 seroreactivity. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to examine the association between HPV16 seroreactivity and esophageal cancer. Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: The mean seroreactivity to HPV16 virus-like particles was significantly higher for the cancer patients than for the control subjects (mean value +/- standard deviation = 0.85 +/- 0.22 versus 0.74 +/- 0.18; P<.0001). When the cancer patients and control subjects were compared by sex and age groups, the differences in mean seroreactivity remained statistically significant. The difference in mean seroreactivity to BPV1 virus-like particles between cancer patients and control subjects was not statistically significant (0.81 +/- 0.28 versus 0.88 +/- 0.32; P = .12); this result was not altered when sex and age groups were compared. By use of a cutoff point for HPV16 seropositivity that was established in studies of cervical neoplasia, 24% of the cancer patients were seropositive compared with 7% of the control subjects, yielding a sex- and age-adjusted OR of 4.5 (95% CI = 1.8-11.9). In general, the OR for esophageal cancer increased with increasing HPV16 seroreactivity. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: HPV16 infection may be a risk factor for esophageal cancer. Further studies of the association between HPV16 infection and the incidence of esophageal cancer are needed.

Antibodies, Viral