PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3321553

[A stochastic computer simulation model for integrated zootechnical, veterinary and economic instruction regarding managerial decisions on dairy farms].

Abstract

A teaching version of a (main frame) simulation model is described in the present paper. The primary purpose of this model is to study the background and effects of management decisions with regard to reproductive performance in dairy cattle. The initial information available is derived from a fertility-health chart, commonly used on commercial dairy farms in the Netherlands. The user than goes through the programme in an interactive manner in order to establish the correct diagnosis as well as to give suitable advice. As all the revenues and costs are simulated, it is also possible to consider the effects of advice from the economic point of view. In imitating real farm conditions as closely as possible, various events and effects of decisions are stochastically involved, i.e. as random samples on appropriate probability distributions rather than as fixed values. People involved in herd health programmes, therefore are given the opportunity of exercising in a field in which farmers cannot permit experiments. The experience gained in using the model in teaching veterinary and agricultural students has been positive so far.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A A Dijkhuizen, P L Roosenschoon, L Elving. 1987-12-01. [A stochastic computer simulation model for integrated zootechnical, veterinary and economic instruction regarding managerial decisions on dairy farms].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3321553/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Detection of two porcine circovirus type 2 genotypic groups in United States swine herds.

In late 2005, sporadic cases of an acute onset disease of high mortality were observed in 10- to 16-week-old growing pigs among several swine herds of the United States. Tissues from the affected pigs in Kansas, Iowa, and North Carolina were examined, and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) was detected consistently among these tissues. Phylogenetically, PCV2 can be divided into two major genotypic groups, PCV2-group 1 and PCV2-group 2. Whereas PCV2-group 1 isolates were detected in all the diseased animals, only two of the diseased animals harbored PCV2-group 2 isolates. This observation is important because PCV2-group 1 isolates had never been reported in the United States before (GenBank as of May 16, 2006), and they are closely related to the PCV2-group 1 isolates that have been described in Europe and Asia, previously. Our analysis revealed that each genotypic group contains a distinct stretch of nucleotide or amino acid sequence that may serve as a signature motif for PCV2-group 1 or PCV2-group 2 isolates.

Animal Husbandry↗

Performance of gestating sows in bedded hoop barns and confinement stalls.

The effects of gestation housing systems on sow and litter performance were evaluated for 2.5 yr in southwest Iowa. Gestation housing system treatments were as follows: 1) individual gestation stalls in a mechanically ventilated confinement building with a partially slatted floor and a manure flush system and 2) group pens with individual feed stalls in deep-bedded, naturally ventilated hoop barns. In all, 957 litters from 353 sows were evaluated. Number of pigs born alive per litter differed for the 2 housing treatments (P = 0.002). Sows gestated in hoop barns gave birth to more live pigs per litter (10.0 +/- 0.2 pigs) than sows gestated in stalls (9.3 +/- 0.2 pigs). Preweaning mortality was not different for the 2 housing treatments (P = 0.70). Cross-fostering was done to equalize litter size within 24 h of birth, which resulted in an equal number of weaned pigs per sow (P = 0.50) regardless of gestation housing treatment. The weaning-to-breeding interval was different (P = 0.01), with sows kept in stalls (4.3 +/- 0.6 d) returning to estrus sooner than sows gestated in hoop barns (6.0 +/- 0.6 d). These results indicate that gestating sows can be housed as groups in deep-bedded hoop barns equipped with individual feeding stalls and will perform comparably to gestating sows housed in confinement systems with individual gestation stalls.

Animal Husbandry↗