PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3324768

External electrical tinnitus suppression: a review.

Abstract

Our experience with transcutaneous electrical stimulation for tinnitus suppression has been with the Theraband Headset from Audimax Inc. The purpose of this article is to review the highlights of the patients who exhibited tinnitus suppression and/or tinnitus control, and to provide an update of our results and techniques using external electrical stimulation with prolonged stimulation (stage IV). Patient selection is considered critical to the success of external electrical stimulation for tinnitus suppression. The key elements include the clinical finding of a peripheral site of lesion of the tinnitus; positive maskability of the symptom of tinnitus; absence of active ear disease; absence of a vestibular asymmetry; and absence or minimal evidence of dysfunction of the central auditory system. The protocol described for patient selection allows for tinnitus identification, the differentiation of clinical tinnitus types, and the clinical application of the concept of the dynamic range of electrical tinnitus suppression. External electrical tinnitus suppression is believed effective in a limited number of patients clinically identified as having a tinnitus site of lesion primarily peripheral in location and cochlear in type. The present device is not commercially available at this time. Both specific and general suggestions are proposed for the standardization of methods of reporting results of electrical tinnitus suppression and tinnitus control.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Shulman. 1987. External electrical tinnitus suppression: a review.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3324768/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Modeling biological motor control for human locomotion with functional electrical stimulation.

This paper develops a novel control system for functional electrical stimulation (FES) locomotion, which aims to generate normal locomotion for paraplegics via FES. It explores the possibility of applying ideas from biology to engineering. The neural control mechanism of the biological motor system, the central pattern generator, has been adopted in the control system design. Some artificial control techniques such as neural network control, fuzzy logic, control and impedance control are incorporated to refine the control performance. Several types of sensory feedback are integrated to endow this control system with an adaptive ability. A musculoskeletal model with 7 segments and 18 muscles is constructed for the simulation study. Satisfactory simulation results are achieved under this FES control system, which indicates a promising technique for the potential application of FES locomotion in future.

Electric Stimulation Therapy↗

Complications and troubleshooting of two-stage sacral neuromodulation therapy: a single-institution experience.

OBJECTIVES: With the increasing use of sacral neuromodulation therapy, urologists are faced with postimplantation challenges. The purpose of this study was to identify these events and their causes and management in our large single-institution experience. METHODS: From July 2002 to September 2004, all patients who underwent sacral neuromodulation therapy for refractory bladder conditions were identified. Their medical records were retrospectively evaluated for history, operative intervention, and programming visits. Events after implantation of the implantable pulse generator (IPG) unit were noted. The evaluation, troubleshooting, management, and resolution of events at the last follow-up visit were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients underwent sacral neuromodulation therapy at our institution. The mean patient age was 53.5 +/- 15.4 years. Of the 214 patients, 161 underwent IPG implantation during a mean follow-up period of 16 months (range 5 to 30). The second-stage explantation and revision rate was 10.5% and 16.1%, respectively. The indications for explantation were infection (8 of 17) and failure to maintain a response (9 of 17). Revisions were done for decreases in response with abnormal (12 of 26) or normal (5 of 26) impedance measurements, IPG site discomfort (4 of 26), draining sinus at the IPG site (4 of 26), and lead migration (1 of 26). Equalization of impedance measurements was the most commonly observed impedance abnormality. These were managed by drying fluid from the connection in 4 patients and lead change in the rest. CONCLUSIONS: After IPG implantation, a decline in response may occur. Although some were explanted, most were revised, with most of the revisions functional on follow-up. Familiarity with impedance evaluation and development of algorithms for postimplant management are essential for troubleshooting and maintenance of the device.

Electric Stimulation Therapy↗