PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3341384

A new statistical test for linkage heterogeneity.

Abstract

A new, statistical test for linkage heterogeneity is described. It is a likelihood-ratio test based on a beta distribution for the prior distribution of the recombination fraction among families (or individuals). The null distribution for this statistic (called the B-test) is derived under a broad range of circumstances. Two other heterogeneity test statistics--the admixture test or A-test first described by Smith and Morton's test (here referred to as the K-test)--are also examined. The probability distribution for the K-test statistic is very sensitive to family size, whereas the other two statistics are not. All three statistics are somewhat sensitive to the magnitude of the recombination fraction theta. Critical values for each of the test statistics are given. A conservative approximation for both the A-test and B-test is given by a chi 2 distribution when P/2 instead of P is used for the observed significance level. In terms of power, the B-test performs best among the three tests over a broad range of alternate heterogeneity hypotheses--except for the specific case of admixture with loose linkage, in which the A-test performs best. Overall, the difference in power among the three tests is not large. An application to some recently published data on the fragile-X syndrome and X-chromosome markers is given.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N Risch. 1988. A new statistical test for linkage heterogeneity.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3341384/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

DNA structures at chromosomal translocation sites.

It has been unclear why certain defined DNA regions are consistently sites of chromosomal translocations. Some of these are simply sequences of recognition by endogenous recombination enzymes, but most are not. Recent progress indicates that some of the most common fragile sites in human neoplasm assume non-B DNA structures, namely deviations from the Watson-Crick helix. Because of the single strandedness within these non-B structures, they are vulnerable to structure-specific nucleases. Here we summarize these findings and integrate them with other recent data for non-B structures at sites of consistent constitutional chromosomal translocations.

Chromosome Fragility↗

Genetic pathways to melanoma tumorigenesis.

The incidence of cutaneous malignant melanomas is growing faster than that of any other cancer and therefore posing a major heath threat worldwide. In melanocytic skin tumours, the feasibility of correlating a specific pathological stage with a corresponding genetic alteration provides a remarkable opportunity to study the multistep tumorigenesis model. This multistep melanoma tumorigenesis is best described as a continuum of transformation of the melanocytes, melanocytic dysplasia, and melanoma formation. These steps involve genotypic alterations including loss of tumour suppressor genes, microsatellite instability, and alterations of the mismatch repair system. This review seeks to examine melanoma tumorigenesis based on these genetic changes.

Chromosome Fragility↗

Candidate tumor suppressor genes at FRA7G are coamplified with MET and do not suppress malignancy in a gastric cancer.

Common fragile sites predispose to specific chromosomal breakage associated with deletion, amplification, and/or translocation in certain forms of cancer. Chromosomal fragile sites not only are susceptible to DNA instability in cancer cells, but may also be associated with genes that contribute to the neoplastic process. FRA7G is a common fragile site containing the candidate tumor suppressor genes CAV1, CAV2, and TESTIN (TES). The human gastric cancer cell line GTL-16 has an amplification of this genomic region and was used to seek evidence for the suppressor candidacy of one of these genes. Our results demonstrate that CAV1, CAV2, and TESTIN are coamplified with the MET oncogene and overexpressed in GTL-16. Somatic mutation was not detected in the coding regions of these genes, although they were each overexpressed. The results show that CAV1, CAV2, and TESTIN are not tumor suppressor genes in this gastric cancer.

Chromosome Fragility↗