PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3347129

[Identification of middle ear implants in high-resolution computerized tomography].

Abstract

As a result of the increase in the use of computed tomography and the possibility of demonstrating very small structures, x-ray diagnosis is becoming more and more important in investigating complications after examined in patients as well as cadaver temporal bones by using high resolution middle ear computed tomography: 1. autologous/allogenic ossicular implants, 2. alloplastic implants made of ceramic, plastic or metal. As can be seen from our investigations the homografts and some of the implants are easily identifiable (autologous/allogenic ossicular implants, Ceravital and Frialit PORP/TORP and metal devices), are only partly identifiable (Fisch-Tef Platinum and Stainless Steel as well as Titan stapes pistons), hardly or not at all identifiable (PORP/TORP and stapes pistons made of plastic, e.g. teflon, silicone, plasti-pore). The same applies to ventilating tubes. Thus the position in the middle ear of metal tubes which have slipped can be seen clearly, whereas plastic tubes cannot be seen so well. It is of clinical importance that prosthesis dislocation is visible in CT so that should complications occur it is better possible to determine whether revision surgery is necessary. As, however, identification of various devices in CT is still not satisfactory, the manufactures must soon fulfil our demands for a contrast agent to be added to prosthesis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Oberascher, M Grobovschek. 1988. [Identification of middle ear implants in high-resolution computerized tomography].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3347129/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Early outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement in young children.

BACKGROUND: Early outcomes after tricuspid valve replacement in young children are ill defined. The experience of the Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium (45 centers, 1984 to 2002) was reviewed to evaluate the results of tricuspid valve replacement in children <6 years of age. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients who underwent initial tricuspid valve replacement are included in the present analysis. The most frequent cardiac diagnoses were Ebstein's anomaly (40%), pulmonary atresia (11%), and tetralogy of Fallot (8%). Age at tricuspid valve replacement was 2.9+/-1.7 years (mean+/-SD). Mean patient weight was 12.7+/-6.1 kg. The major outcome was survival to discharge. Associations among age, diagnosis, valve type/size, and outcome were evaluated through the use of chi2 analysis and logistic regression model fitting approaches. Hospital mortality was 26% and was very high (64%) in patients <1 year of age. A large size-to-weight ratio was the strongest predictor of mortality based on multivariable analysis (P<0.001). Mortality was 54% for patients with a size-to-weight ratio >2.5. Other complications included heart block requiring a pacemaker (13%) and thrombosis (5%). Pacemaker implantation was associated with the use of a mechanical valve (23% versus 6% bioprosthetic valve; P=0.01) CONCLUSIONS: Tricuspid valve replacement in young children is associated with high mortality, especially in infants <1 year of age. Surgical options other than tricuspid valve replacement such as transplantation may need to be considered in infants.

Bioprosthesis↗