PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3349772

BASIC programs to analyse minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) antimicrobial susceptibility results.

J Ling·K W Chan·K L Ling·G L French
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BASIC programs have been written to analyse minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) antimicrobial susceptibility results for large numbers of organisms and a wide variety of antimicrobials. The output of the programs lists the numbers, percentages, cumulative numbers and cumulative percentages of organisms inhibited at different concentrations. The distribution of MICs are additionally printed as a histogram. The range, MIC for 50% and 90% of organisms (MIC50 and MIC90 respectively), and the geometric mean MIC of each drug are also calculated.

Explore related subjects

Electronic Data ProcessingMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrocomputersProgramming LanguagesSoftwareJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Ling, K W Chan, K L Ling, G L French. BASIC programs to analyse minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) antimicrobial susceptibility results.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(88)90080-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Dosimetric pre-treatment verification of IMRT using an EPID; clinical experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In our clinic a QA program for IMRT verification, fully based on dosimetric measurements with electronic portal imaging devices (EPID), has been running for over 3 years. The program includes a pre-treatment dosimetric check of all IMRT fields. During a complete treatment simulation at the linac, a portal dose image (PDI) is acquired with the EPID for each patient field and compared with a predicted PDI. In this paper, the results of this pre-treatment procedure are analysed, and intercepted errors are reported. An automated image analysis procedure is proposed to limit the number of fields that need human intervention in PDI comparison. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Most of our analyses are performed using the gamma index with 3% local dose difference and 3mm distance to agreement as reference values. Scalar parameters are derived from the gamma values to summarize the agreement between measured and predicted 2D PDIs. Areas with all pixels having gamma values larger than one are evaluated, making decisions based on clinically relevant criteria more straightforward. RESULTS: In 270 patients, the pre-treatment checks revealed four clinically relevant errors. Calculation of statistics for a group of 75 patients showed that the patient-averaged mean gamma value inside the field was 0.43 +/- 0.13 (1SD) and only 6.1 +/- 6.8% of pixels had a gamma value larger than one. With the proposed automated image analysis scheme, visual inspection of images can be avoided in 2/3 of the cases. CONCLUSION: EPIDs may be used for high accuracy and high resolution routine verification of IMRT fields to intercept clinically relevant dosimetric errors prior to the start of treatment. For the majority of fields, PDI comparison can fully rely on an automated procedure, avoiding excessive workload.

Electronic Data Processing↗
PubMed2006

The emergence of radiofrequency identification tags: applications in surgery.

Radiofrequency identification (RFID) is a wireless method of automatic identification. Currently, RFID tags are emerging into our environment in many aspects of our lives. Applications are being developed in a variety of fields, including health care. Aspects of surgical care will lend themselves to this approach. This technology could provide large amounts of data that not only carry the promise of improving health care, but also may have an impact on personal aspects of our daily lives. Each of us must become familiar with the risks and benefits of RFID use.

Electronic Data Processing↗