Multiprogram characterization of laboratory bias, precision, and total error. Proposal for improved assessment with shared external and expanded internal (regional) quality control pools.

Abstract

We establish that, for the analytes aspartate aminotransferase, glucose, phosphorus, and potassium, there is significant correlation between laboratory performance as determined by College of American Pathologists-sponsored external (Surveys) and expanded internal (regional) quality control (Quality Assurance Service) programs. However, relatively low parametric and nonparametric correlation coefficients and significant departure of linear regression slopes from unity reflect major differences in the calculated parameters of absolute bias, precision, and total error obtained through internal and external quality control. Significantly better performance in both Surveys and the Quality Assurance Service was documented for laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists Laboratory Accreditation Program. Multiple descriptors of laboratory quality, as indicated here, are superior in describing laboratory performance to proficiency testing alone. As a bridge between external and internal quality control, shared pools of quality control materials are described for use as unknown Survey challenges and subsequent distribution for regional quality control. Such programs, which can be configured to serve thousands of laboratories, could offer cost savings, better quality assurance, and improved characterization of laboratory performance by minimizing interprogram differences in control matrix and method classification and providing greater reliability of target values.