PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3355639

Instrumentation for small joints: the arthroscope.

G G Poehling
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This first of three articles on arthroscopy of small joints is a brief overview of the current arthroscopes and the modifications that have made arthroscopy of small joint spaces possible. Those modifications include angulation at 25-30 degrees, improved low-light, high-resolution chip cameras, and use without a bulky camera adapter. The largest possible arthroscope should be used, but size is limited in diameter to 2.0 mm for the distal radioulnar and temporomandibular joints, 2.7 mm for the midcarpal joint, and 3.0 mm for the radiocarpal joint. The need to have high-quality repair service available is stressed.

Explore related subjects

ArthroscopesEquipment DesignHumansJointsPhotographyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G G Poehling. 1988. Instrumentation for small joints: the arthroscope.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-8063(88)80012-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

[Indications and techniques for wrist arthroscopy].

After considering the anatomy of the wrist, the technical requirements for wrist arthroscopy are discussed. This method is used as an additional diagnostic procedure and staging procedure as well as a therapeutic technique. Complications, which are rare, most commonly involve nerve irritation, damage to cutaneous nerves and extensor tendons. Lose bodies can be removed arthroscopically, however, arthroscopically assisted fracture treatment or the removal of ganglions are uncommon. Approaches are lateral and oriented on the extensor tendons or other anatomical landmarks. Arthroscopy is especially useful by carpal instability as it offers many possibilities, not only diagnostically but also therapeutically.

Arthroscopes↗
PubMed2006

[Percutaneous perforation of the posteromedial capsuloligamentous structures to avoid cartilaginous damage due to arthroscopic intervention at the medial meniscal posterior horn in narrow joints].

THE PROBLEM: Irreversible cartilaginous damage to the femur and tibia due to resection and suture instruments in arthroscopic surgery at the posterior horn of the medial meniscus in narrow knee joints or in the presence of contracted medial capsuloligamentous structures. THE SOLUTION: Enlargement of the medial joint space by repeated percutaneous perforation of the posteromedial capsuloligamentous structures under consistently applied valgus stress. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: With the knee joint almost in full extension and with simultaneous, uniformly applied valgus stress, repeated percutaneous perforation of the posteromedial capsuloligamentous structures with a sharp-tipped cannula until perceptible enlargement of the medial joint compartment is achieved. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AND RESULT: Uneventful healing of the posteromedial capsuloligamentous structures without the need for any special postoperative treatments.

Arthroscopes↗