PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 336978

[Graphical methods in data analysis (author's transl)].

Abstract

Data analysis is concerned with attentive description and communication of the information contents of a body of data. Background information, conceptual insight and especially graphical methods play a key role in data analysis for developing a feeling for the data both by formal procedures to be applied in the light of specified models and even more by informal inference or methods that are suggestive and conctructive. This paper reviews graphical methods useful for description, screening, analysis, cross-examining, selection, reduction, presentation and summary of data: for uncovering distributional peculiarities and understanding the structure underlying experimental and survey data. Moreover scatter plots, probability plots and residual plots provide insight into the possible inappropriateness of certain assumptions of the statistical model. Some techniques are illustrated by examples: four-dimensional data may be reprented as scatter plot on ordinary graph paper by using a combination of 2 different sets of symbols for at most 7 different levels of the third variable (formula: see text) and of the fourth variable (formula: see text). Comments on the use of tables and graphical methods, a small overview of the latter and of the scope of applications endeavour to pave the way such that structures may be better understandable and unanticipated characteristics may be spotted.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Sachs. 1977-10-15. [Graphical methods in data analysis (author's transl)].. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01488184

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Patients' requests of an outpatient clinic.

Three-hundred-twenty-five consecutive predominantly lower-class new patients at a psychiatric outpatient clinic rated the importance they attached to each of 14 categories of treatment needs or requests. Psychiatric residents subsequently rated the importance of each request for each patient at the conclusion of their initial assessment interview. Requests reflecting needs for intrapsychic therapy, clarification, and control of feelings were considered very important by approximately two thirds of the patients; needs for institutionalized contact, advice, and community triage by one half; and other requests for medication, reality contact, succorance, ventilation, confession, social intervention, administrative requests by a minority (one fourth to one third). Residents significantly underestimated the importance their patients attached to 10 of 14 requests. Factor analyses confirmed several systematic sources of disparity between patient and therapist perception of lower-class patient needs.

Factor Analysis, Statistical

Dimensionality of the repression sensitization scale.

Study of the internal structure of the R-S Scale failed to support a finding of unidimensionality or bipolarity, as theory suggests. A factor analysis of the item matrix revealed a poorly defined multifactor structure that contained five relatively weak unipolar factors (N = 200). Guttman's Reproducibility and the Kuder-Richardson Coefficient adjusted for test length similarly failed to support the presence of a unifactor structure. The relatively high Coefficient of Dimensionality was rejected as evidence of unidimensionality given the uncertainty over what psychometric properties this index reflects. The high proportion of S-item interaction variance showed considerable equivocal item content, which suggested marked error factors due to Ss' idiosyncratic interpretation of items.

Factor Analysis, Statistical

The orthogonal rotation of factors in clinical research: a critical note.

Examined the current trends in rotation procedures used in factor analyses in clinical research. It was found that orthogonal rotations, usually varimax procedure, were overwhelmingly the rotational choice. It was suggested that in many analyses, investigators in this area of research may be imposing orthogonality on data that might better be interpreted as oblique factors. Guidelines were presented for consideration in the selection and reporting of rotational procedures in clinical research.

Factor Analysis, Statistical