PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3399466

How to make consultations work.

Abstract

The consultation process exists to improve patient care in an era of medical complexities, but breakdowns in the process are common because of poor communication and inadequate physician education on the subject. The referring physician and the consultant both need to assume important responsibilities if quality patient care is to be ensured. The referring physician has to establish the reasons for and urgency of the consultation, communicate them to the consultant, and supply appropriate clinical information. The consultant has to determine the questions being asked, evaluate the patient, and communicate the findings and recommendations back to the referring physician. Whenever possible, the patient should be included in the decision-making process.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J B Marshall. 1988. How to make consultations work.. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1988.11700384

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗