PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3449633

Can rational prescribing be assessed?

T D van Zwanenberg·G B Grant·D A Gregory
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The prescribing of a group of young general practitioners was assessed, before and after educational intervention, using five parameters of rational prescribing. The proportion of drugs prescribed by their generic name, and the proportion falling within a basic formulary for general practice increased significantly even though the participating doctors had neither been involved in the compilation of the formulary nor been given a copy of it. Items prescribed bygeneric name rose from 45 to 74% and the proportions of new and repeat items within the formulary rose by 73 to 83% and 68 to 77% respectively. It appears that discussions about rational prescribing lead to similar changes in prescribing as involvement in the compilation of a formulary.The notion of an ;essential drugs list' for general practice is described, and three easily applied measures of rational prescribing are suggested: (1) the proportion of patients not given a prescription, (2) the proportion of drugs written in their generic form and (3) the proportion of drugs falling within a general practice ;essential drugs list'.

Explore related subjects

Drug PrescriptionsEnglandFamily PracticeFormularies as TopicHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T D van Zwanenberg, G B Grant, D A Gregory. 1987. Can rational prescribing be assessed?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3449633/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Clicking for pills.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Drug Prescriptions↗
PubMed2007

Safe prescribing.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Drug Prescriptions↗
PubMed2007

Provision of pain management by a pharmacist with prescribing authority.

PURPOSE: The clinical and financial outcomes of a pain clinic managed by a pharmacist with prescribing authority are described. SUMMARY: Pharmacist clinicians in a for-profit, integrated health system recently received permission to bill for their services in certain ambulatory clinics. A pharmacist clinician, who had an individual Drug Enforcement Administration number and whose services are billable under New Mexico law, was chosen to assume the medication management responsibilities in a clinic where 90% of the patient population is treated for chronic non-cancer-related pain. No additional personnel were needed, and no additional space was required, eliminating overhead for the space and utilities needed for operating a new clinic. With the ability to bill for the pharmacist clinician's services, a new model for justification of clinical pharmacy services was developed for the ambulatory care clinics. The revenue generated was tracked by a medical billing system, and clinical outcomes were tracked using the clinic's database for patients' individual visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. Between June 2004 and June 2005, an average of 18 patients were seen by the pharmacist clinician each day. The clinic generated 107,550 dollars of actual revenue and saved the health plan over 450,000 dollars. There was a consistent decrease in mean VAS pain scores with continued visits. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic non-cancer-related pain were managed effectively by a pharmacist with prescribing authority and refill authorization in a pain management clinic. The favorable clinical outcomes, revenue generated, and cost savings achieved justified the pharmacist clinician's services in this health system.

Drug Prescriptions↗