PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3460585

Simultaneous multiple comparison procedures in psychiatric research.

Abstract

The multiple comparison problem arises in any research design in which the scores of more than two groups are compared on a single dependent variable. The analysis of variance provides a way of testing the null hypothesis that all population means are equal with a type 1 error rate of alpha. When the joint null hypothesis is accepted, the outcome of such a test is unambiguous: all population means are equal. When the null hypothesis is rejected, ANOVA is insufficient to identify the pattern of departure from equality. The Scheffe procedure can be used to test any number and type of contrast that is suggested by an inspection of the data. It ensures that the chance of incorrectly rejecting one or more hypotheses in the set so tested cannot exceed alpha. Contrasts between the population means which are specified independently of the data can be tested using Bonferroni-adjusted t tests to control the experimentwise error rate. Factorial ANOVA designs can also be analysed by testing linear contrasts. If a researcher has definite expectations about the pattern of mean differences, he can test a set of planned contrasts with a familywise error rate (if contrasts are written within main effects and interaction effects) or an EER. If he is uncertain about which hypotheses to test, post hoc procedures which are modifications of the Scheffe technique can be used.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W Hall, K D Bird. 1986. Simultaneous multiple comparison procedures in psychiatric research.. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048678609158864

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗