PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3470741

Structure of A-DNA in solution.

Abstract

The structure of DNA in aqueous trifluoroethanol solutions containing more than 70% (vol/vol) trifluoroethanol, where it has been proposed to have the A-conformation, has been studied by the technique of electric linear dichroism. The data demonstrate that both linear phi X174 DNA [5386 base pairs (bp) long] and a 172-bp fragment of sea urchin 5S RNA gene are in the double-helical A-form in the alcoholic solution and that two of the important structural parameters, the base tilt and the base-pair translation along the helical axis, are the same as in the A-form structure of crystalline double-helical d(GGTATACC). Despite its molecular length, the limiting reduced dichroism (-1.41) of the phi X174 DNA in low-salt aqueous solution is near the theoretical limit (-1.50) for DNA with base planes perpendicular to the helical axis. Transformation of this DNA and also of the 172-bp fragment to the A-structure in alcohol solutions reduces the experimental value of the dichroism to about -1.04, which agrees almost exactly with the value of -1.03 calculated for the A-form crystal. The base-pair translation along the helical axis was determined from relaxation of the DNA dichroism when the electric field is turned off. The 172-bp fragment is found to have a base-pair translation of only 2.6 A in the A-structure and is thus the same as in A-DNA fibers and in the A-form oligomers crystals. We conclude from the coincidence of the base-pair translation and the apparent values of the base tilt that the A structures are identical or nearly so in the solution and solid states. Comparison of the phi X174 data with data on smaller DNA fragments and with the data on the 172-bp sea urchin gene fragment unambiguously confirms that, in aqueous solution, the experimental reduced electric dichroism of B-DNA is highly dependent on molecular length, while the dichroism of the A-DNA form in alcoholic solutions is independent of molecular length at least in the range from 172 to 5386 bp.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Charney, H H Chen. 1987. Structure of A-DNA in solution.. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.6.1546

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sp1 is essential for p16 expression in human diploid fibroblasts during senescence.

BACKGROUND: p16(INK4a) tumor suppressor protein has been widely proposed to mediate entrance of the cells into the senescent stage. Promoter of p16(INK4a) gene contains at least five putative GC boxes, named GC-I to V, respectively. Our previous data showed that a potential Sp1 binding site, within the promoter region from -466 to -451, acts as a positive transcription regulatory element. These results led us to examine how Sp1 and/or Sp3 act on these GC boxes during aging in cultured human diploid fibroblasts. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Mutagenesis studies revealed that GC-I, II and IV, especially GC-II, are essential for p16(INK4a) gene expression in senescent cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) and ChIP assays demonstrated that both Sp1 and Sp3 bind to these elements and the binding activity is enhanced in senescent cells. Ectopic overexpression of Sp1, but not Sp3, induced the transcription of p16(INK4a). Both Sp1 RNAi and Mithramycin, a DNA intercalating agent that interferes with Sp1 and Sp3 binding activities, reduced p16(INK4a) gene expression. In addition, the enhanced binding of Sp1 to p16(INK4a) promoter during cellular senescence appeared to be the result of increased Sp1 binding affinity, not an alteration in Sp1 protein level. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: All these results suggest that GC- II is the key site for Sp1 binding and increase of Sp1 binding activity rather than protein levels contributes to the induction of p16(INK4a) expression during cell aging.

Base Composition↗

Application of CE for determination of DNA base composition.

DNA base composition expressed as mol% of guanine plus cytosine (% GC) or GC content is a key parameter of bacterial taxonomy and genomic analyses. Direct chemical determination methods such as HPLC as well as indirect methods based on physical properties of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), melting point (T(m)), and buoyant density (B(d)) have been conventionally applied to determine the GC content. However, these methods require relatively large amounts of sample DNA, time, and labor. We have developed a protocol to determine the GC content by fine separation of nucleosides with CZE. Genomic DNAs with known GC content from 23 bacterial strains were determined by CE at the optimized conditions of 27 degrees C, 20 kV in 50 mM of NaHCO(3) (pH 9.0) and 70 mM SDS added. Nucleosides from <1 microg of DNA hydrolyzed with nuclease-P1 and bacterial alkaline phosphatase were separated in a 75 microm wide and 80 cm long silica capillary. The nucleoside peak areas were determined at 254 nm in less than 12 min. The CE-based determination of GC content requires only small amounts of DNA, and thus should be applicable to environmental genomics (metagenomics), as >90% of environmental micro-organisms are nonculturable and produce only small amounts of genomic DNA.

Base Composition↗