PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3491749

Screening for auditory dysfunction in high risk neonates.

Abstract

Brainstem auditory evoked responses were recorded in 117 pre-term and 71 full-term infants from the general population of infants born at a referral obstetric unit. The threshold intensity required to evoke a reliable BAER was determined at different post-menstrual ages (PMAs) and in many cases at follow-up clinics. The BAER thresholds for 12 infants born and tested at less than 31 wk PMA were all greater than or equal to 50 dBHL. Sixty-two low-gestational-age infants who were tested between 31 and 36 wk PMA had BAER thresholds between less than or equal to 30 dBHL and greater than or equal to 80 dBHL. The majority of pre-term and term infants tested at term equivalent age had BAER thresholds less than or equal to 30 dBHL. Longitudinal studies also indicated that BAER thresholds can decline rapidly during the pre-term period. Follow-up studies showed that those pre-term and term infants with BAER thresholds less than or equal to 30 dBHL had normal auditory thresholds as determined using conventional behavioural testing at 4 or more months of age. Of those infants with BAER thresholds greater than or equal to 40 dBHL at the time of discharge or at term equivalent age, 67% (n = 16) were confirmed later as having a moderate to profound hearing deficit. The remaining 8 infants in this group had had BAER thresholds at term of 40 or 50 dBHL and had normal BAER and behavioural thresholds at follow-up. The cross-sectional and longitudinal data indicate that the majority of low-gestational-age infants who are at risk of hearing deficit achieve BAER thresholds less than or equal to 30 dBHL by term equivalent age. We recommend that auditory screening of infants in this group is best performed at the time of discharge from hospital or at term equivalent age, whichever is the later. Those infants with thresholds greater than or equal to 40 dBHL at that time should be encouraged to attend follow-up testing and, if high thresholds persist, they should then be referred on for behavioural testing and assessment for habilitative support.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A G Pettigrew, D A Edwards, D J Henderson-Smart. 1986. Screening for auditory dysfunction in high risk neonates.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3782(86)90116-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Intraoperative monitoring by transtympanic electrocochleography and brainstem electrical response audiometry in acoustic neuroma surgery.

The preservation of hearing is a major aim of contemporary temporal bone surgery. Our present findings demonstrate that intraoperative monitoring is a key method for attaining serviceable postoperative hearing after the removal of an acoustic neuroma. Both electrocochleography (ECoG) and brainstem electrical response audiometry were performed in 96 patients operated on for acoustic neuromas. The specificity of the different monitoring methods was affected by surgical manipulations in addition to such non-specific influences as CSF drainage, core body temperature and anesthesia. In the present study ECoG was found to be more reliable in assessing the intra- and postoperative course with respect to the preservation of cochlear function.

Audiometry, Evoked Response

[Effect of decreased and lost high frequency hearing on latency of acoustically evoked brain stem reaction].

The diagnosis of retrocochlear damage is supported by an increased latency difference between peak I and peak V. In case of high frequency hearing loss peak I is often hard to determine, and peak V latency may be shifted not only by neural delay, but also by missing basal hair cells. The amount of cochlear delay can be estimated by a procedure presented here. High frequency decay was simulated by steep high-pass noise masking. Peak V latency turned out to be established by the highest unaffected frequency components of the click stimulus. Thus, in case of a high frequency gap (with normalization towards higher frequencies) latency may be almost normal. In case of prolonged latency the amount ascribable to the cochlea may be rather precisely be estimated. If the whole lag is explained this way, unnecessary further diagnostics can be avoided.

Audiometry, Evoked Response

[Evoked otoacoustic emissions as a screening test for hearing evaluation in newborn and premature infants?].

The purpose of this study was the evaluation of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) for the screening of infant hearing. EOAE and brainstem-evoked response audiometry (BERA) were performed in 40 infants at a special care unit at the Universitäts-Klinik, Göttingen. Both examinations were performed under non-optimal conditions, reflecting a realistic screening situation. The purpose was to determine robust analysis criteria and possible error sources. A comparison of both tests shows that sensitivity and specificity are insufficient for reliable screening. The EOAE test does not yield the threshold of hearing. There is no sharp boundary with the BERA threshold for the detectability of an EOAE. Sensitivity and specificity have not been accurately determined so far due to the relatively small number of infants with impaired hearing tested. Nevertheless, the results show that EOAE should be applied as a supplement to conventional audiometry for infants. It is capable of excluding conductive and severe cochlear hearing losses and is by itself not a reliable screening test.

Audiometry, Evoked Response