PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3497832

Exocrine pancreatic function in dyspepsia.

Abstract

The prevalence of pancreatic diseases as the cause for dyspepsia differs in clinical materials between 0 and 25-30%. In parallel, the incidence rate of chronic pancreatitis varies between 0.7 and 10 per 100,000 inhabitants per year. The correct figures are unsettled. The main reason for the great variability in figures for frequency of chronic pancreatitis is probably the different clinical awareness and variable practice for performing morphological and functional studies of the pancreas in patients with dyspepsia. Epidemiologic data indicate, but do not prove, an increasing frequency of chronic pancreatitis at least valid for the alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatic function and pancreatic disease are probably connected to different gastro-intestinal diseases (duodenal ulcer, inflammatory bowel diseases, malabsorption syndromes, subtotal and total gastrectomy and to some extent in patients with hepatobiliary diseases). The prevalence of chronic pancreatitis can be calculated to around 70 per 100,000 inhabitants in the Western world. Around one-third of these present with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. The demand for enzyme substitution based on marked exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in patients with chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and mucoviscidosis can be calculated to approximately 150 patients per 1 million inhabitants. The question concerning the analgetic effect of pancreatic enzyme substitution is still unsettled.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Worning. 1987. Exocrine pancreatic function in dyspepsia.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000199527

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗