PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3505286

Providing census data for general practice. 2. Usefulness.

C Foy·A Hutchinson·J Smyth
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Computerized census data are described in relation to a general practice population. The previously published methods for scoring deprivation - underprivileged areas score and material deprivation score - are applied to the data. Wards and enumeration districts within a single practice area are ranked by both methods and examples show the wide variation in deprivation scores for enumeration districts within single wards. The value of these data to a general practice is discussed with particular reference to developing a profile of the practice and to planning prevention and anticipatory care.

Explore related subjects

Catchment Area, HealthDemographyFamily PracticeHumansMedically Underserved AreaMethodsUnited KingdomJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Foy, A Hutchinson, J Smyth. 1987. Providing census data for general practice. 2. Usefulness.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3505286/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

[Program of care of disabled patients at a health center].

OBJECTIVE: To systematise primary attention to the disabled by means of a programme of specific action. To create a Risk Map for the problem of "abandonment of the elderly disabled". DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study. SITE. El Palo Health Centre (Málaga). First two years of the programme (1989-1991). PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Patients with physical and/or mental disability attending to Centre to obtain services. The basic Primary Attention Team. Key informants, the Voluntary Social service. INTERVENTION: Activities: Recruitment strategies: Programme of Planned Home Visits (Subscribers' Register, Individualised Care Plan), Risk Map of Basic Area. RESULTS: 142 patients were included in the first year, and 203 in the second year, carrying out 4.66 and 5.95 programmed visits per patient per year, respectively. The Risk Map defined 28 areas ranked according to risk.

Catchment Area, Health↗
PubMed1992

Developing a district diabetic register.

OBJECTIVES: To compile a district wide diabetic register of all diabetic patients registered with general practitioners in the catchment area of a single district general hospital and to compare different approaches to identifying patients. DESIGN: Information for a register was obtained from general practitioners' practice registers, the Prescription Pricing Authority, and hospital diabetic clinic records. SETTING: Catchment area of an inner London district general hospital with a large diabetic clinic. SUBJECTS: All patients with a diagnosis of diabetes resident in or attending general practitioners or hospital clinics in the district or its catchment area. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of diabetes, population of patients elicited by different approaches, proportion attending the local district general hospital, cost of using prescription returns for identifying diabetic patients. RESULTS: 4674 patients with diabetes were identified from all sources of information, which corresponds to a mean of 22.4 patients per general practitioner and the prevalence of known diabetes of 1.17%. 39.4% of patients identified had Prescription Pricing Authority returns and 42.8% of patients appeared on practices' diabetic registers. Only 56.5% of patients identified attended the district general hospital. For practices where all sources of information were available, practice registers included 60.4% of all patients, and prescription returns and the clinic register identified 64.9% and 40.6% respectively. The cost of using prescription returns to identify patients not detected in other ways was 6.37 pounds per patient. CONCLUSION: The task of developing district diabetic registers may prove, even in one cross sectional attempt, a major task in many inner city health districts.

Catchment Area, Health↗