PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3528461

Hypersensitive teeth. Part II: Treatment.

Abstract

If the hydrodynamic theory for pain transmission were accepted, occlusion of the patent dentinal tubules would appear to be essential for treatment efficacy. There are many compounds with seemingly varied chemical forms that have been shown to be effective. Their exact mode of action however, is not clearly defined because well-designed, nonbiased, and controlled comparison studies between agents are lacking. The various toothpastes may have ingredients that actually occlude patent tubules or they may cause secondary desensitization by irrational or abrasive action. In any pain study, the nature of the placebo effect and other psychogenic factors play a significant role. Fluoride preparation with and without iontophoresis has been shown to alter tubule structure and form microprecipitates. The natural desensitization process, although slow, is nature's protection, allowing dentinal sclerosis of secondary dentin formation. Although the resin-adhesive systems, especially the new light-cured dentin bonding agents, appear immediately to be effective, the effect on the pulp remains unknown. Perhaps a combination of iontophoresis with sodium fluoride and light-cured dentin bonding material may yield protection and desensitization at a high level of predictability. With the population trends toward a more geriatric society, further research, knowledge, and understanding of dentinal hypersensitivity is of paramount importance. The expected increase in longevity of the dentition suggests that dentin exposure and sensitivity will increase as a clinical problem. There is a clear time-age relationship involved in gingival recession, erosion and attrition of the teeth, and the need for periodontal surgical therapy. For total comprehensive care, patient comfort is important and should be provided along with sound periodontal health and ideal restorative function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J T Krauser. 1986. Hypersensitive teeth. Part II: Treatment.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90009-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Healing substrates with mobile, particle-filled microcapsules: designing a 'repair and go' system.

We model the rolling motion of a fluid-driven, particle-filled microcapsule along a heterogeneous, adhesive substrate to determine how the release of the encapsulated nanoparticles can be harnessed to repair damage on the underlying surface. We integrate the lattice Boltzmann model for hydrodynamics and the lattice spring model for the micromechanics of elastic solids to capture the interactions between the elastic shell of the microcapsule and the surrounding fluids. A Brownian dynamics model is used to simulate the release of nanoparticles from the capsule and their diffusion into the surrounding solution. We focus on a substrate that contains a damaged region (e.g. a crack or eroded surface coating), which prevents the otherwise mobile capsule from rolling along the surface. We isolate conditions where nanoparticles released from the arrested capsule can repair the damage and thereby enable the capsules to again move along the substrate. Through these studies, we establish guidelines for designing particle-filled microcapsules that perform a 'repair and go' function and thus, can be utilized to repair damage in microchannels and microfluidic devices.

Adhesives↗

Bonding to ground versus unground enamel in fluorosed teeth.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of grinding on the bonding effectiveness of a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive to fluorosed enamel. METHODS: The teeth were classified using the Thylstrup and Fejerskov index (TFI). Fluorosed teeth (TFI=5) obtained from Isparta (Turkey) and control teeth (TFI=0) obtained from Leuven (Belgium) were used. Using a depth-marking diamond bur, 0.3mm of enamel was removed from mid-buccal and mid-palatal/lingual surfaces of the teeth, whereas the area adjacent to the ground area was left unprepared. A two-step self-etch (Clearfil Protect Bond, Kuraray) and a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Optibond FL, Kerr) were used to bond the resin composite to the ground and unground enamel. Rectangular micro-specimens were prepared using the slow-speed diamond saw and tested in tensile to determine the micro-tensile bond strength (microTBS). RESULTS: The microTBS to unground fluorosed enamel was significantly lower than to ground fluorosed enamel for Clearfil Protect Bond (15.8+/-15.2 and 45.0+/-12.4MPa, p<0.0001) and for Optibond FL (35.5+/-21.4 and 50.5+/-12.3MPa, p<0.05), respectively. In control teeth, Clearfil Protect Bond bonded better to ground enamel (p<0.01), whereas OptiBond FL exhibited a similar bonding effectiveness to ground and unground enamel (p=0.0634). SIGNIFICANCE: Preparation of enamel improved the resin-enamel bond strength in fluorosed teeth. The bonding effectiveness to unground enamel was lower in fluorosed teeth than in control teeth for the self-etch adhesive tested.

Adhesives↗