PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3536224

A non-computer expert's experience with the computer.

Abstract

In summary, I have tried to illustrate how the computer is rapidly becoming indispensable to the physician. This is true for both the physician in private practice as well as the physician involved in research. Computer technology has progressed to the point that a personal computer is readily affordable. Technologic advances and new software packages permit individuals who possess no computer skills to operate almost any system without limitations. There are no age limits to learn how to use the computer. I was introduced to the computer through my clinical research in malignant melanoma as a medical student. Its utility in research is undeniable. The uses of the computer have increased dramatically during the past few years. Today the computer aids not only in research but in the day-to-day care of patients and in medical education. Access to the information explosion is literally at the tips of the physician's fingers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G S Rogers. 1986. A non-computer expert's experience with the computer.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3536224/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Waiting in the emergency department.

AIMS: To examine waiting times, reasons for waiting, and patient knowledge of those reasons, in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Data were collected on patients presenting to the emergency department over 7 weeks. Those who waited more than 30 minutes in the waiting room or more than 2 hours in the total department were studied further. RESULTS: Thirty seven percent exceeded the times above (group A). Mean times for this group were 175 mins. Only 7% stayed in the waiting room more than 30 minutes. Delays were related to doctors (42%), waiting for tests and results (16%), prolonged treatment and assessment (12%), and other reasons (30%). Only 47% were clear about why they were waiting. CONCLUSIONS: Some extended waiting is appropriate. Unnecessary delays are common and can be avoided by attention to facilities, improving deployment of staff, and removal of bottlenecks in testing procedures. Waiting time in emergency departments will alter as observation wards and definitive treatments by emergency specialists increase. The public will need to be fully informed as these changes take place.

Appointments and Schedules