PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3537268

External cephalic version: a clinical experience.

Abstract

Eighty-five normal women underwent external cephalic version (ECV) for breech presentation in the late 3rd trimester. The protocol included real time ultrasonic scanning and pre- and post-procedure electronic fetal monitoring. Subcutaneous terbutaline sulfate (0.25 mg.) was administered to (43/85 or 50.5%) of ECV candidates and rendered the procedure easier for patient and operator. A single operator, head-over-heels technique assisted by supine Trendelenberg's position was used. Rh negative women were routinely administered 300 mcg of immune globulin. Successful ECV (53/85, 62.5%) was related to maternal parity, but not to gestational age nor eventual delivery weight. In this series only engagement of the breech was reliable in predicting ECV failure. Fifty of 51 (98.1%) successfully verted women delivered a cephalic presentation infant at term. Cesarean section was performed in 5/51 of these patients (9.8%) for routine obstetrical indications. In one case, compound presentation at term resulting in dystocia and eventual cesarean section was believed related to prior successful version. In contrast, 15/30 (50%) of the ECV failure patients went on to operative delivery despite a liberal institutional policy toward term vaginal breech trials. In addition, the only serious fetal complication in this series, meconium aspiration, occurred in a vaginally delivered breech infant. It is unlikely that late 3rd trimester ECV will impact on out overall rate of cesarean delivery. In North America prematurity is the greatest risk factor in malpresentation and our policy increasingly is to permit attempts at term breech vaginal delivery. Nonetheless, ECV deserves serious consideration. When successful, ECV avoids the costs and/or risks of either cesarean section or vaginal trial of breech.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J P O'Grady, J C Veille, R L Holland, K A Burry. 1986. External cephalic version: a clinical experience.. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpme.1986.14.3.189

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Breech presentation: is there a difference in eye movement patterns compared with cephalic presentation in the human fetus at term?

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to characterize eye movement patterns in the human fetus at term persisting in breech presentation. STUDY DESIGN: Studied were 11 fetuses in breech presentation and 12 in cephalic presentation at 36 to 41 weeks' gestation, of which the presentation remained unchanged from 32 weeks' gestation until delivery. With real-time ultrasonography we analyzed three measurements by means of the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test: (1) duration of eye-movement and no-eye-movement periods, (2) frequency of eye movements, and (3) proportion of horizontal, vertical, and oblique eye movements. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the eye movement directions between breech and cephalic fetuses: horizontal (median 70.3% vs 80.2%), vertical (17.4% vs 11.0%), and oblique (13.1% vs 9.1%), respectively. No differences were noted in the duration of eye-movement and no-eye-movement periods or in the frequency of eye movements. CONCLUSION: Eye movement pattern, in direction, of term fetuses persisting in breech presentation run on a different in-utero developmental course of neural control from those in cephalic fetuses.

Breech Presentation

Route of delivery for the breech presentation: a conundrum.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the feasibility of resolving the controversy regarding route of delivery for breech presentation in a randomized, prospective fashion. STUDY DESIGN: The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-sponsored Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network, which is composed of 11 perinatal centers, was surveyed to determine the feasibility of a randomized clinical trial of cesarean section versus trial of labor for breech presentation. A review of the literature was performed to determine the experience of other investigators with designing and conducting an adequate prospective, randomized trial. RESULTS: Principal investigators and faculty from seven of 11 centers within the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network agreed to participate adn felt that they could adequately recruit patients for a trial in very-low-birth-weight infants. This would provide approximately 200 very-low-birth-weight fetuses in a breech presentation per year. Sample size calculations indicated that 1700 infants would be required. Investigators also had strong reservations about performing a trial of vaginal breech delivery for other gestational ages. A review of the literature indicates that other authors have encountered difficulty in attempting randomized clinical trials of this nature. CONCLUSIONS: The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network with its pool of 60,000 deliveries per year agreed that a randomized, controlled delivery route of labor in the 24- to 28-week breech presentation was not feasible in a reasonable period of time. A randomized clinical trial of larger fetuses in a breech presentation was also considered extremely difficult. These findings are similar to those of other authors who have attempted or proposed randomized clinical trials to determine the safety of planned vaginal delivery of the breech presentation at various gestational ages.

Breech Presentation

Impact of a nurses' strike on the cesarean birth rate.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose is to describe the impact of a 31-day nurses' strike on the cesarean birth rate in the province of Manitoba, Canada. STUDY DESIGN: Computerized hospital records, obtained for all births over a 24-month period, were used to identify complications of labor indicating cesarean section, method of delivery, and adverse maternal and newborn outcomes. The strike interval was compared with a 16-month prestrike period. RESULTS: The cesarean section rate in the strike interval, 12.5 per 100 deliveries, was significantly lower than the prestrike rate of 14.6 per 100 deliveries (p < 0.05). Reductions occurred primarily among breech deliveries and among women with a previous cesarean section. No differences were observed in the rates of individual adverse maternal or newborn outcomes. However, the pooled incidence of adverse newborn outcomes was significantly higher during the strike than during the prestrike period (10.2 vs 8.1/100 deliveries, odds ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.52). CONCLUSION: In response to constraints imposed by a reduced nursing complement, physicians increased the frequency of vaginal birth in breech presentation and among women with previous cesarean section.

Breech Presentation