PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 353951

[GAST after 3 years' use].

Abstract

Increasing of systematic syphilis screening has led many scientists to think to automatisation of classical cardiolipid reactions. The Debains-Kolmer reactions have been adapted to continuous flow but they appear actually inefficient. The use of ART (automated reagin test) gives very satisfying results and this reagent has obtained its homologation in the United States. The apparition of Groupamatic has incitated M. GARRETTA to adapt on this material the K. Antigen reagent manufactured by the Blood Transfusion Center in Lille and has led to the definition of GAST reagent (Groupamatic automated syphilis test). The authors describe the method of preparation of this reagent and its utilization on Groupamatic. It appears that the bovin cardiolipidic extract, non specific by definition, lays down to antagonist problems: to be sensitive enough when specific enough. It's the final reagent settlement which is the more delicate and which needs the maximum in manipulation. Yet, the composition of GAST is now well established and this reagent, ready for use, may be kept during three months at 4 degrees C. Then the authors describe the results of their own use of GAST, in routine on Groupamatic 360: out of 6 079 plasmas of blood donnors examined, 3 per cent of reactions are positive or doubtfull (which stays compatible with the screenings in large number). After confirmation with complementary tests made with manually GAST, RPR with microscopic reading, haemagglutination, and lastly fluorescent method, it appears that the rate of positive reactions is 1,7%. This result is conformable to habitual statistics. In conclusion, the GAST is a well-adapted reagent for Groupamatic technology, and represents a progress compared with classical manually methods. The adaptation of syphilis screening on Groupamatic is a factor of rentability of this equipment, allowing to realize 360 tests in one hour. At last, considering that cardiolipidic reactions are not of an absolute diagnostic value, treponemic complementary tests are necessary in order to confirm positive results picked up on Groupamatic.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Chateau, J Champalbert. 1978. [GAST after 3 years' use].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0338-4535(78)80092-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Use of the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer for rapid and reproducible molecular typing of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis is an economic and fast technique for molecular typing but has the drawback of difficulties in accurately sizing DNA fragments and comparing banding patterns on agarose gels. We aimed to improve RFLP for typing of the important human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae and to compare the results with the commonly used typing techniques of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing. We designed primers to amplify a noncoding region adjacent to the pneumolysin gene. The PCR product was digested separately with six restriction endonucleases, and the DNA fragments were analyzed using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer for accurate sizing. The combined RFLP results for all enzymes allowed us to assign each of the 47 clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae tested to one of 33 RFLP types. RFLP analyzed using the bioanalyzer allowed discrimination between strains similar to that obtained by the more commonly used techniques of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, which discriminated between 34 types, and multilocus sequence typing, which discriminated between 35 types, but more quickly and with less expense. RFLP of a noncoding region using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer could be a useful addition to the molecular typing techniques in current use for S. pneumoniae, especially as a first screen of a local population.

Autoanalysis↗

A three-armed trial of the ThinPrep Imaging System.

We compared the performance of the ThinPrep (TP) Imaging System (TIS) with manual reading of TP slides (TPM) and with manual reading of the paired conventional Pap smear (PS) in terms of sensitivity for and positive predictive value (PPV) of high-grade disease and productivity. The study consisted of 11,416 routine PS and paired TP slides as well as 103 confirmed abnormal TP slides. In terms of sensitivity for the detection of biopsy-confirmed high-grade disease, overall there was no statistically significant difference between TIS-screened TP (TPI) and TPM (81.1% vs. 86.8%). For the routine cases, TPI was significantly more sensitive than PS (73.4% vs. 57.8%). In terms of PPVs for the cytologic prediction of high-grade disease, there was no statistically, significant difference among TPI, TPM, and PS (75.6%, 73.9%, and 84.6%). For cytologic reports of possible high-grade disease, the PPVs were equivalent for TPI (45.0%) and TPM (37.0%) and there was no significant difference in PPVs between TPI and PS (61.3%). For TP slides, TIS screening showed a 27% productivity gain when compared with manual screening and a 54% productivity gain when compared with manual screening of PS slides. Use of TIS showed productivity benefits when compared with TPM and both productivity and sensitivity benefits over use of PS.

Autoanalysis↗