PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3543739

[Echographic study in evaluating gastrointestinal pathology].

P V Federici·P Preziosi·F Karakaci·T Guarna
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The echographic study of the gastrointestinal tract is hampered by the presence of gas that prevents the long-range penetration of the ultrasound beam. However the presence of a mass with a central echogenic region surrounded by a sonolucent wall of over 1.5 cm is characteristic of intestinal pathologies. A study of 23 patients with gastrointestinal disorders in whom echography revealed specific pictures is presented.

Explore related subjects

AppendicitisCrohn DiseaseDiagnosis, DifferentialGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansUltrasonographyEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P V Federici, P Preziosi, F Karakaci, T Guarna. 1986-12-15. [Echographic study in evaluating gastrointestinal pathology].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3543739/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Optimizing US examination to detect the normal and abnormal appendix in children.

BACKGROUND: US detection of a normal appendix can safely rule out appendicitis. However, there is a wide range of accuracy in detection of a normal appendix. OBJECTIVE: To optimize US examination to detect the normal and the abnormal appendix according to the potential positions of the appendix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 107 children who underwent gray-scale US scanning. Noncompressive and compressive graded sonography was performed to detect normal and abnormal appendices according to their potential positions. The maximum transverse diameter of the appendices was measured. RESULTS: Of the 107 children examined, 56 had a histologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Sonography had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 98% for the diagnosis of appendicitis. A normal appendix was visualized in 44 (86.2%) of the 51 patients without acute appendicitis, and of these 44, 43 were true-negative and 1 was false-positive. Normal and abnormal appendices, respectively, were positioned as follows: 54.4% and 39.3% were mid-pelvic; 27.2% and 28.6% were retrocecal; 11.4% and 17.8% were deep pelvic; and 6.8% and 14.3% were abdominal. CONCLUSION: US scanning according to the potential positions of the appendix was useful in the detection of normal appendices in children suspected of having appendicitis.

Appendicitis↗