PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3549864

Laser therapy in gastrointestinal practice.

R A Sanowski
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Use of the Nd:YAG laser in therapeutic endoscopy has caught the imagination of many physicians. Understanding the principles of laser physics to apply laser techniques correctly is not difficult. Currently, the laser is used for control of gastrointestinal hemorrhage and for debulking obstructing tumors in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Hemostasis has been achieved in 70-100% of patients with a variety of bleeding lesions. Specific laser techniques vary in the power used and exposure time, but some standardization has been agreed on. Obstructing gastrointestinal neoplasms may now be safely and effectively ablated to achieve patency of the lumen. Perforation from laser therapy occurs in 1% or less of patients treated, making this a reasonably safe form of treatment. The high cost of laser unit (approximately $85,000) and the availability of equally effective and more reasonably priced alternatives require careful attention to the cost-effectiveness of the laser. Training physicians in the safe use of lasers is a problem that still must be solved by the users and instrument makers.

Explore related subjects

EndoscopyGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansLaser TherapyLasersJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A Sanowski. 1987. Laser therapy in gastrointestinal practice.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-198702000-00021

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Training with simulation improves residents' endovascular procedure skills.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular procedure simulators are now commercially available and in use for physician training. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of simulation-based training in vascular surgery residencies. METHODS: Residents from vascular surgery programs in a five-state area were invited to participate in a series of 2-day endovascular training programs that used a high-fidelity endovascular procedure simulator (SimSuite; Medical Simulation Corporation, Denver, Colo), didactic instruction, computer-based training, and tabletop procedure demonstrations. The curriculum covered arteriography and intervention for treatment of aortoiliac, renal, and carotid artery disease. Nine residents participated, with one to three per training session. Each completed an average of 9.5 simulated endovascular cases. Performance on a standardized TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus B iliac angioplasty/stenting case was used to assess endovascular skills and knowledge at the beginning of the training program, and this was repeated at the completion of the training. Performance metrics were measured by the simulator, faculty observed trainees' performance of simulated cases, and trainees provided their evaluations of the usefulness of the simulation experiences. RESULTS: Endovascular procedural skills on the standardized iliac intervention case improved after completion of the training program. Compared with performance early on day 1, performance improved (P < or = .05; paired t test): total procedure time decreased 54%, volume of contrast decreased 44%, and fluoroscopy time decreased 48% (mean change from baseline). Selection of angioplasty balloon catheters and stents was improved, and the average number of catheters used and stents deployed decreased, although this did not reach statistical significance. Faculty observation allowed identification of shortcomings of knowledge and skills, including common problems with selection of catheter, balloon, and stent sizes; correct positioning of the sheath; and intraprocedural monitoring. Postcourse evaluations indicated support for the use of simulation in vascular surgery residents' endovascular training. CONCLUSIONS: Training with a simulator, incorporated into an individual or small group learning session, offers a means to learn and realistically practice endovascular procedures without direct risk to patients, with measurable improvements in key performance metrics. How simulation training affects subsequent clinical performance has yet to be established.

Endoscopy↗
PubMed2007

Intraoperative surgical navigation for endoscopic sinus surgery: rationale and indications.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review discusses the rationale and indications for image-guided surgery through a critical discussion of registration concepts as well as clinical reports. RECENT FINDINGS: The surgical navigation accuracy achieved by commercially available image-guided surgery systems is best reported as target registration error. Clinically achievable target registration error is probably in the 1.5-2.0 mm range. Dry lab studies of registration serve to highlight the principles of registration, the process through which image-guided surgery systems calculate the one-to-one mapping relationship between the preoperative imaging data and the intraoperative surgical volume. Reports on image-guided surgery have highlighted its usefulness in primary and revision endoscopic sinus surgery, osteoplastic frontal sinusotomy, transsphenoidal hypophysectomy, endoscopic cerebrospinal fluid leak repair and endoscopic pterygomaxillary fossa biopsy. Both three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and computed tomography-magnetic resonance fusion images have been incorporated into IGS for advanced minimally invasive endoscopic skull base procedures. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery policy statement accurately summarizes the current consensus for image-guided surgery applications. SUMMARY: Image-guided surgery has emerged as an important technology, which both general otolaryngologists and subspecialty rhinologists can employ for a wide variety of procedures.

Endoscopy↗