PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3567305

Sample size for testing differences in proportions for the paired-sample design.

Abstract

Miettinen (1968, Biometrics 24, 339-352) presented an approximation for power and sample size for testing the differences between proportions in the matched-pair case. Duffy (1984, Biometrics 40, 1005-1015) gave the exact power for this case and showed that Miettinen's approximation tends to slightly overestimate the power or underestimate the sample size necessary for the design power. A simple alternative approximation that is more conservative is presented here. In many cases, the sample size for the independent-sample case provides a conservative approximation for the matched-pair design.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R J Connor. 1987. Sample size for testing differences in proportions for the paired-sample design.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3567305/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An overview of the integrative research review.

The integrative literature review has many benefits to the scholarly reviewer, including evaluating the strength of the scientific evidence, identifying gaps in current research, identifying the need for future research, bridging between related areas of work, identifying central issues in an area, generating a research question, identifying a theoretical or conceptual framework, and exploring which research methods have been used successfully. The 5-stage integrative review process includes (1) problem formulation, (2) data collection or literature search, (3) evaluation of data, (4) data analysis, and (5) interpretation and presentation of results. Maintaining scientific integrity while conducting an integrative research review involves careful consideration to threats to validity. Strategies to overcome these threats are reviewed. The integrative review methodology must involve detailed and thoughtful work, the outcome of which can be a significant contribution to a particular body of knowledge and, consequently, to practice and research.

Research Design↗