PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3568889

[Introducing a simple biopsy needle].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D X Qin. 1986. [Introducing a simple biopsy needle].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3568889/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of palpable breast masses: comparison of conventional smears with the Cyto-Tek MonoPrep system.

BACKGROUND: One of the limitations preventing the widespread use of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is that it requires skill to obtain an adequate sample and well prepared smears. In this study, a new monolayer technique, the Cyto-Tek MonoPrep (MP) system, which obviates the need for smear preparation, was evaluated against conventional smear (CS) preparation for palpable breast lesions. METHODS: A total of 44 paired CS/MP breast FNA specimens were studied. The authors blindly analyzed the CS and the MP slides separately, then by a side-by-side evaluation. The two methods were compared with respect to diagnostic concordance, cellularity, cell preservation, background debris, and time needed to prepare and diagnose each case. RESULTS: An exact diagnostic correlation was present in 34 of 44 (77%) cases. The 10 noncorrelating cases were caused by decreased cellularity in the MP cases; nonetheless, 7 of these were correctly assigned to the right general diagnostic category, whereas the remaining 3 cases had insufficient cells. In addition to overall lesser cellularity on MP, fibroadenoma cases had smaller epithelial sheets and absence of stroma compared with CS. Both methods had comparable cellular preservation and diagnostic evaluation time, but background debris and preparation time were greater for MP. CONCLUSION: CS are favored over MP for the preparation of breast FNA specimens in centers with specialized FNA services because of their higher diagnostic yield, ease of preparation, and availability for immediate cytologic evaluation. However, in settings where specimens are collected sporadically by unskilled clinicians, the MP system may prove to be useful as an alternative or an adjunct to CS. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol)

Biopsy, Needle

Detection and quantitation by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and image analysis of HER-2/neu gene amplification in breast cancer fine-needle samples.

BACKGROUND: Fine-needle sampling, although a practical and noninvasive method of tissue acquisition, has rarely been used for HER-2/neu fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). To assess HER-2/neu gene amplification in mammary carcinoma, FISH signals on cytology and corresponding tissue biopsies were detected visually and measured by image analysis. The results were correlated with patient and tumor characteristics. METHODS: In situ HER-2/neu DNA probe hybridization was performed on 61 cytology specimens and on 47 corresponding frozen sections of breast carcinomas. Tumors were classified by visual evaluation as unamplified, moderately amplified, or highly amplified. Multiparametric image analysis was performed using the Discovery automated image analyzer (Becton Dickinson, Leiden, Netherlands). The integrated fluorescence ratio (IFR) was calculated for each sample as the integrated FISH fluorescence of the tumor cells divided by the integrated FISH fluorescence of internal control cells containing two spots. The percentage positive nuclear area (PPN), calculated as the area of FISH fluorescence divided by the area of nuclear DNA fluorescence, and the PPR, ratio of the PPN of the tumor cells divided by the control cells, were also calculated for each sample. RESULTS: Visual analysis yielded 46 unamplified and 15 (24.6%) amplified (seven moderately amplified and eight highly-amplified) tumors. Strong (P < 0.001) correlation between results on cytological and histological materials was obtained. The FISH spots on the cytological preparations were more easily visualized and scored than those on the corresponding tissue sections. Visual HER-2/neu signal scoring was strongly correlated with IFR (P = 0.0001) and PPR (P = 0.0001). Within the tumors classified as highly amplified by visual examination, quantitation of the degree of amplification fluorescence signal was possible using image analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Cytologic specimens were a suitable and representative source of materials for detection and quantitation of HER-2/neu gene amplification by FISH and image analysis. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol)

Biopsy, Needle