PubMed · 357688
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R Cogan, E P Edmunds. The unkindest cut?. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-2182(78)90022-8
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Episiotomy is performed in over half of the hospital-based deliveries in the US, despite the dearth of scientific data demonstrating its usefulness in uncomplicated cases. After roughly 70 years of widespread use in the US, the first randomized clinical trial of episiotomy conducted in North America (and the first worldwide involving median episiotomy) found no evidence for better outcomes in deliveries assigned to "liberal" than those assigned to "restricted" use of episiotomy. These results lend support to the many health professionals and lay persons calling for further reduction in the use of this procedure.
A total of 416 gloves were tested for punctures after 200 episiotomy repairs. Evidence of perforation was found in 34 (8%) of the gloves used and in only half the cases did the surgeon actually realise that a perforation had occurred. The left index finger and thumb were more often perforated than other parts of the gloves. The implications of the findings, especially as regards spread of infections to surgeons, are discussed.