PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3577709

Nerve fiber layer photography. A comparative study.

Abstract

Observation of the retinal nerve fiber layer with red-free light is an important means of evaluating optic nerve integrity. Many investigators have attempted to increase the usefulness of the technique by improving photographic procedures. Most reports comparing various parameters neither indicate the method of comparison nor give quantitative measure of the improvement gained with different films, filters, cameras, or processing procedures. We have compared in a masked fashion the parameters most recently recommended in the literature. Twelve trained observers compared 12 masked pairs of nerve fiber layer photos taken from the same eye in the same manner on two cameras and preferred those taken with a Canon CF-60Z camera 69% of the time and those taken with a Zeiss FF-111 17% of the time (this difference was statistically significant, P less than 0.01). Fourteen observers compared 14 pairs of photographs and judged Panatomic-X film to be superior to Plus-X film 51% of the time and both films to be of the same quality 25% of the time (this difference was also significant P less than 0.05). Fifteen observers compared 12 pairs and preferred the Standard SE-40 blue filter 2:1 over the green Spectrotech 540 filter. This difference was not statistically significant, and the preference was found to be dependent on fundus pigmentation and clarity of the media. The blue filter gave better contrast for the nerve fiber layer in patients with lightly pigmented fundi, and use of the green filter resulted in less light scatter in patients with ocular media opacities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Peli, T R Hedges, T McInnes, J Hamlin, B Schwartz. 1987. Nerve fiber layer photography. A comparative study.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1987.tb08495.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Complex adaptive systems: a response to Luchins.

Luchins (2003, Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 31(2), 183-186) distinguishes the mutual strengths and shortcomings of qualitative and quantitative approaches as applied to the complexities of evaluation psychiatric hospital functioning in particular, and behavioral healthcare practice in general. This brief response offers an examination of the complex interplay of factors within non-linear models in a conceptualization of complex adaptive systems for understanding causal factors in mental health administration as well as calling into question the myth of the relationship between measurement and hence control and understanding and prediction.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

In search of a familial cancer risk assessment tool.

Approximately one in three individuals will be affected by cancer in their lifetime in the United States, and some are at elevated risk because of family history. Although assessment of family history of cancer and cancer risk is the standard of care, the current health-care system appears unable to meet this need. Because individuals are increasingly using the Internet, web-based cancer risk assessment tools (CRATs) may provide a way to meet this need. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the types of familial CRATs available on the Internet and their nature. The current review evaluated five CRATs identified through an Internet search based on (i) their ability to identify those at the highest risk of cancer (i.e. those with hereditary cancer syndromes), (ii) their strengths and limitations based on criteria adapted from Rich and colleagues (2004, 2005), (iii) their readability based on four readability calculations, and (iv) their quality based on criteria from Health on the Net. The general limitations of CRATs as a whole were also delineated, including concerns about availability to those who are poor and underserved and those who have lower levels of literacy. Recommendations for future tools include assessing risk for a greater number of diseases, using theoretically driven approaches to increase the likelihood that individuals will engage in appropriate health behaviors, and making a greater effort to reach diverse populations.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research.

The overall aim of this study was to contribute to the development of metasynthesis through an analysis of the challenges involved. The study grew out of the critique of qualitative metaresearch raised by current developers of metamethodologies. Different views on the application of methodologies have emerged in the literature, contributing to confusion and ambiguity concerning the challenging questions of what, why, how, and who in metasynthesis research, which might increase the risk of misunderstanding. The roots of metasynthesis research are seen as multifaceted and influencing the development of the methods in different directions. The primary worth of metasynthesis is theoretical and/or methodological development (synthesis) combined with the potential for reflection: going beyond and behind the studies (meta). Metasynthesis research has also the potential to raise questions of research collaboration, culture, and language.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗