PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3580487

Simulation of double-stranded branch point migration.

B H Robinson·N C Seeman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A structural and dynamic model has been developed for the branch point formed when two DNA double helices exchange strands during genetic recombination. This model, which generalizes most previous structural models, maintains the twofold symmetry inherent in the covalent and hydrogen bonded structure, yet has three degrees of freedom about virtual bonds, constituting a simplified junction. Using this structural model, a three-step dynamic model for branch point migration has been developed: longitudinal diffusion about the virtual bonds to achieve a structure in which the helix axes are approximately parallel; opening of the base pairs; and rotary diffusion about the helix axis to effect a migratory event. The model, which includes the possible role of electrostatic interactions, solves problems inherent in previous treatments. We find that no significant electrostatic torques arise that promote branch point migration. The absence of a kinetic mechanism to circumvent thermodynamic barriers due to mispairing suggests that an energy source is used for those situations in living systems.

Explore related subjects

Base CompositionDNAKineticsMathematicsModels, GeneticNucleic Acid ConformationProbabilityRecombination, GeneticJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B H Robinson, N C Seeman. 1987. Simulation of double-stranded branch point migration.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(87)83386-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Sp1 is essential for p16 expression in human diploid fibroblasts during senescence.

BACKGROUND: p16(INK4a) tumor suppressor protein has been widely proposed to mediate entrance of the cells into the senescent stage. Promoter of p16(INK4a) gene contains at least five putative GC boxes, named GC-I to V, respectively. Our previous data showed that a potential Sp1 binding site, within the promoter region from -466 to -451, acts as a positive transcription regulatory element. These results led us to examine how Sp1 and/or Sp3 act on these GC boxes during aging in cultured human diploid fibroblasts. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Mutagenesis studies revealed that GC-I, II and IV, especially GC-II, are essential for p16(INK4a) gene expression in senescent cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) and ChIP assays demonstrated that both Sp1 and Sp3 bind to these elements and the binding activity is enhanced in senescent cells. Ectopic overexpression of Sp1, but not Sp3, induced the transcription of p16(INK4a). Both Sp1 RNAi and Mithramycin, a DNA intercalating agent that interferes with Sp1 and Sp3 binding activities, reduced p16(INK4a) gene expression. In addition, the enhanced binding of Sp1 to p16(INK4a) promoter during cellular senescence appeared to be the result of increased Sp1 binding affinity, not an alteration in Sp1 protein level. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: All these results suggest that GC- II is the key site for Sp1 binding and increase of Sp1 binding activity rather than protein levels contributes to the induction of p16(INK4a) expression during cell aging.

Base Composition↗
PubMed2007

Application of CE for determination of DNA base composition.

DNA base composition expressed as mol% of guanine plus cytosine (% GC) or GC content is a key parameter of bacterial taxonomy and genomic analyses. Direct chemical determination methods such as HPLC as well as indirect methods based on physical properties of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), melting point (T(m)), and buoyant density (B(d)) have been conventionally applied to determine the GC content. However, these methods require relatively large amounts of sample DNA, time, and labor. We have developed a protocol to determine the GC content by fine separation of nucleosides with CZE. Genomic DNAs with known GC content from 23 bacterial strains were determined by CE at the optimized conditions of 27 degrees C, 20 kV in 50 mM of NaHCO(3) (pH 9.0) and 70 mM SDS added. Nucleosides from <1 microg of DNA hydrolyzed with nuclease-P1 and bacterial alkaline phosphatase were separated in a 75 microm wide and 80 cm long silica capillary. The nucleoside peak areas were determined at 254 nm in less than 12 min. The CE-based determination of GC content requires only small amounts of DNA, and thus should be applicable to environmental genomics (metagenomics), as >90% of environmental micro-organisms are nonculturable and produce only small amounts of genomic DNA.

Base Composition↗