PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 359377

Correction of crossbite.

B D Lee
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present to the dental practitioner a better insight and understanding into the recognition, etiology, timing of treatment, differential diagnosis, and methods of treatment for the anterior and posterior crossbite conditions as seen in the developing dentition of the child. It is important to realize that early diagnosis, correction, or referral to a specialist of these occlusal irregularities may prevent the possibility of any adverse effects upon the growth and development of the child's dental-skeletal-facial complex.

Explore related subjects

CephalometryChildCrownsDental Occlusion, BalancedDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansIncisorMalocclusionOrthodontic AppliancesPalatal Expansion TechniquePatient Care PlanningStainless SteelTime FactorsTooth Movement TechniquesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B D Lee. 1978. Correction of crossbite.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/359377/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2004

Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography.

AIM: The aim of this study was to measure organ doses and calculate the effective dose for indirect and direct digital cephalometric exposures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Indirect digital cephalometric exposures were made of a Rando phantom head using a Cranex Tome multipurpose unit with storage phosphor plates from Agfa and the direct digital (Charge Coupled Device, CCD) exposures were made with a Proline Ceph CM unit. Exposure settings were 70 kV and 4 mAs for indirect digital exposures. Direct digital exposures were made with 70 kV, 10 mA and a total scanning time of 23 s. TLD700 dosemeters were used to measure organ doses, and the effective doses were calculated with (effective dose(sal)) and without inclusion of the salivary glands. A pilot study was carried out to compare diagnostic image quality of both imaging modalities. RESULTS: Effective doses were 1.7 microSv for direct digital and 1.6 microSv for indirect digital cephalometric imaging. When salivary glands were included in the calculation, effective doses(sal) were 3.4 microSv and 2.2 microSv respectively. Organ doses were higher for direct digital imaging, except for the thyroid gland, where the organ doses were comparable. Diagnostic image quality of indirect and direct digital cephalometric images seemed comparable. CONCLUSION: Effective dose and effective dose(sal) were higher for direct digital cephalometric exposure compared with indirect digital exposure. Organ doses were higher for direct digital cephalography. From preliminary data, it may be presumed that diagnostic image quality of indirect and direct digital cephalometric images are comparable.

Cephalometry↗
PubMed2004

Reliability test of the visual assessment of cranial traits for sex determination.

Interobserver variation in visual evaluation was analyzed for 10 cranial traits in a homogeneous archaeological series. Two observers independently scored cranial traits commonly used for determination of sex. Though determination of sex did not differ significantly for the two observers, individual traits had different levels of interobserver reliability. In addition, indices of relative "maleness" and "femaleness" derived by the two observers differed at statistically significant levels. Because such indices are used in cross-population comparisons of relative gracility and robusticity of diverse samples, these comparisons should be interpreted with caution when more than one investigator has performed an assessment. Most of our instances of interobserver discordance derived from character traits described in subjective terms without accompanying diagrams. Clarity of definition, rather than number of character traits, was found to be critical for effective determination of sex by the visual assessment method. Use of fewer, more precisely defined character traits can improve interobserver reliability.

Cephalometry↗