PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3618613

Computer-based support system for formulary decisions.

Abstract

A system is described in which opinions about potential formulary drugs are given numerical values that are compiled into computer-generated reports. The Formulary Decision Support System (FDSS) is a menu-driven database management and statistical package that quantifies pharmacy and therapeutics (P & T) committee drug evaluations. Each P & T committee member inserts numbers on a computer-generated form to rate a given drug for a given indication according to criteria such as effectiveness, cost, and adverse reactions. Each individual rates the drug in relation to the ideal drug for a given indication and rates the relative importance of the criteria in the evaluation (e.g., effectiveness may be twice as important a consideration as cost). Individuals' evaluations are weighted on the basis of level of responsibility and experience or specific practice area. FDSS also compiles individuals' data to indicate overall committee ratings. The system requires P & T committee members to covert subjective opinions to numerical data that permit comparisons among drugs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Senthilkumaran, S M Shatz, R F Kalies. 1987. Computer-based support system for formulary decisions.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3618613/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Ranking radiotherapy treatment plans using decision-analytic and heuristic techniques.

Radiotherapy treatment optimization is done by generating a set of tentative treatment plans, evaluating them, and selecting the plan closest to achieving a set of conflicting treatment objectives. The evaluation of potential plans involves making trade-offs among competing possible outcomes. Multiattribute decision theory provides a framework for specifying such trade-offs and using them to select optimal actions. Using these concepts, we have developed a plan-ranking model which ranks a set of tentative treatment plans from best to worst. Heuristics are used to refine this model so that it reflects the clinical condition of the patient being treated and the practice preference of the physician prescribing the treatment. A figure of merit is computed for each tentative plan and is used to rank the plans. The approach described is very general and can be used for other medical domains having similar characteristics. The figure of merit can also be used as an objective function by computer programs that attempt to automatically generate an optimal treatment plan.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted