PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3625354

Texture discrimination at different eccentricities.

Abstract

Differences in preattentive texture discrimination between central vision and peripheral vision were studied with textures composed of random dots. The subject had to discriminate between two textures whose first-order statistics were kept identical but whose second-order statistics were different. For textures of constant retinal size the discrimination was easy in central vision, but the decrease of visual acuity with increasing eccentricity made the textures unresolvable in peripheral vision. When the textures were scaled by the cortical magnification factor derived from the frequency of retinal ganglion cells so that the calculated neural representations of the textures became similar at different eccentricities, texture discrimination became independent of visual field location. This indicates that preattentive texture discrimination based on differences in second-order statistics of random dots operates similarly in central vision and peripheral vision.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Saarinen, J Rovamo, V Virsu. 1987. Texture discrimination at different eccentricities.. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.4.001699

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Human tactile discrimination of curvature when contact area with the skin remains constant.

A forced choice paradigm was used to measure the capacity of human subjects to discriminate the curvature of stimuli applied passively to the skin of an immobilized finger. The stimuli consisted of spherically curved segments with a base radius of 2.5 mm; thus the area of contact with the fingerpad skin was approximately 19.6 mm2 for all stimuli. There were 2 series of experiments. In series 1, the standard surface had a curvature of 286 m-1 (radius of curvature 3.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 13%. In series 2, the standard had a curvature of 154 m-1 (radius 6.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 18%. Thus, even when the contact area between the surface and the skin was invariant, humans were able to discriminate small changes in curvature using only information from the cutaneous receptors.

Discrimination, Psychological

Segregation of mesh-derived textures evaluated by resistance to added disorder.

In the "figure detection task" the strength of segregation for a particular texture pair was estimated by the threshold amount of added disorder that prevented segregation of a textured figure from a textured ground. Disorder was either jitter in the orientation of the texture elements, or jitter in their xy positions, or a mixture of the two. Other procedures included lowpass filtering, and a task requiring discrimination between textured figures of different shapes. Orientation cues are weakly or inconsistently used for segregating mesh textures. The low spatial harmonics are very important. A new finding is that orientation and position jitter thresholds for a set of figure/ground texture patterns are often proportional. In a mixture the one disorder can be exchanged for the other.

Discrimination, Psychological