PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3626575

Dispersal polymorphisms in subdivided populations.

Abstract

Price's method for analyzing natural selection in subdivided populations is applied to the problem of dispersal polymorphism strategies in a stable habitat. The results agree with the more traditional Mendelian models for this same problem that have recently been published. Further, by using Price's method, the results obtained are simpler and more general, and the causal evolutionary mechanisms underlying the predicted patterns are more easily recognized. The most interesting new result is that the equilibrium proportion of dispersed individuals is a simple function of the risk of dispersing and the regression coefficient of relatedness among individuals who, in the absence of dispersal, would compete for a limited, local resource. This regression coefficient refers to the genotypes that control the dispersal phenotype. For example, when mothers control the phenotype of their progeny, then the regression is from the mother onto an offspring chosen randomly from the local group before dispersal; while when offspring control their own phenotype, the regression is taken directly from offspring onto a randomly chosen cohort member before dispersal. This use of controlling genotypes to calculate regressions explains the form of the parent-offspring conflict over dispersal noted by previous authors. The simplicity and generality of these results suggest that Price's method is a useful approach for studying the class of phenomena known as "games among relatives".

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S A Frank. 1986-10-07. Dispersal polymorphisms in subdivided populations.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5193(86)80122-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of methods for analysis of selective genotyping survival data.

Survival traits and selective genotyping datasets are typically not normally distributed, thus common models used to identify QTL may not be statistically appropriate for their analysis. The objective of the present study was to compare models for identification of QTL associated with survival traits, in particular when combined with selective genotyping. Data were simulated to model the survival distribution of a population of chickens challenged with Marek disease virus. Cox proportional hazards (CPH), linear regression (LR), and Weibull models were compared for their appropriateness to analyze the data, ability to identify associations of marker alleles with survival, and estimation of effects when all individuals were genotyped (full genotyping) and when selective genotyping was used. Little difference in power was found between the CPH and the LR model for low censoring cases for both full and selective genotyping. The simulated data were not transformed to follow a Weibull distribution and, as a result, the Weibull model generally resulted in less power than the other two models and overestimated effects. Effect estimates from LR and CPH were unbiased when all individuals were genotyped, but overestimated when selective genotyping was used. Thus, LR is preferred for analyzing survival data when the amount of censoring is low because of ease of implementation and interpretation. Including phenotypic data of non-genotyped individuals in selective genotyping analysis increased power, but resulted in LR having an inflated false positive rate, and therefore the CPH model is preferred for this scenario, although transformation of the data may also make the Weibull model appropriate for this case. The results from the research presented herein are directly applicable to interval mapping analyses.

Genotype↗