PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3637222

Rational product evaluation.

E Larson·L Maciorowski
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This article describes a systematic method for planning and implementing a program for product evaluation. Steps for the planning process include appointing a centralized, decision-making group, developing an evaluation plan, implementing mechanisms to introduce new products, defining follow-up methods, and developing methods to identify product needs. Steps in the implementation process include initiating product requests, exploring options, evaluating options, and summarizing findings on which to base a final product decision. A tool for product evaluation is presented.

Explore related subjects

CommunicationDecision MakingEquipment SafetyEquipment and Supplies, HospitalEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansNurse AdministratorsProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingPurchasing, HospitalJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Larson, L Maciorowski. Rational product evaluation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3637222/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗