PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3646023

Productive employee interviewing. Methods for choosing OR staff.

Abstract

The hiring interview is a widely used method of identifying qualified applicants to fill the needs of an organization. Careful planning and organizing before the applicant arrives can minimize the risks of gaps in information and poor impressions of the institution. One-to-one or panel interviewing can be conducted, but using structured questions and scoring in a consistent manner are essential for validity. Questions should be job-related and standardized. Scoring the responses to questions provides a mechanism for evaluation and comparison. To enhance the interview process, attention should be given to the overall environment and initial greeting of the applicant. Listening to implicit as well as explicit messages helps the interviewer develop opinions and impressions that can be explored by further discussion or additional questions. Assessment of skills, knowledge, motivation, and personality traits provides a composite of applicant potential and suitability. Although it may not offer a 100% guarantee of success, interviewing can be a rewarding experience for both you and the applicant.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E H Battle. 1987. Productive employee interviewing. Methods for choosing OR staff.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(07)65876-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Conditional reimbursement within the Dutch drug policy.

In The Netherlands, conditional reimbursement is considered to be a promising approach to achieving more effective and efficient pharmaceutical care. Because of its formal status and nationwide regulation, conditional reimbursement may allow governments to better control medical decision-making. To evaluate the effects of conditional reimbursement on medicine use and its performance as a policy tool, we compared observed volumes of medicine use with expected volumes. In addition, we mapped the annual growth by analysing trends in the volumes of use of all conditionally reimbursed drugs; starting with the year the drug entered the market (using macro-level data). Next we explored five cases in depth (using micro-level data) in order to explore what fraction of individual prescriptions met the requirements. We also performed qualitative research (document analysis, interviews (N=65)) in order to obtain the stakeholders' perspectives on how the measure functions, as well as to interpret the case studies data further. The findings suggest that conditional reimbursement may be an effective policy instrument, but that several changes are needed to optimize its impact. These changes are predominantly related to transparency (e.g. conditions are set following clear procedures and criteria), legitimacy (conditions should be consistent with criteria for prioritization), feasibility of procedures to control appropriate use, and timely and appropriate commitment of the stakeholders.

Interviews as Topic↗

The effect of defined violations of test security on admissions outcomes using multiple mini-interviews.

INTRODUCTION: Heterogeneous results exist regarding the impact of security violations on student performances in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). Three separate studies investigate whether anticipated security violations result in undesirable enhancement of MMI performance ratings. METHODS: Study 1: low-stakes: MMI station stems provided to a random half of 57 medical school applicants 2 weeks in advance of participation in a research study. Study 2: high-stakes: 384 medical school applicants sat a 12-station MMI to determine admission. Each half received 1 of 2 pilot MMI station stems 2 weeks in advance. Study 3: high-stakes: 38 interviewees with dual applications to occupational therapy and physiotherapy experienced the same 7-station MMI twice on the same date. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in MMI performances were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Predictable violations of MMI security do not unduly influence applicant performance ratings.

Interviews as Topic↗