PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3658528

Changing patterns in neonatal respiratory diseases.

D J Field·A D Milner·I E Hopkin·R J Madeley
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Using the current Nottingham Health District, England, as a geographically defined population we have investigated the changing patterns of neonatal respiratory diseases. We have categorized all newborns who developed a respiratory problem during either 1977 or between April 1, 1983, and March 31, 1984 using a system based on that of Hjalmarson (Acta Paediatr Scand 1981; 70:773-783). There has been no change in the incidence of any of the disease types. However, the gestation of babies in two groups, idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome (IRDS) and minimal respiratory disturbance (requiring added oxygen for less than 6 hours), has shown a significant reduction. Overall, mortality for infants developing IRDS has shown a slight decrease, and for infants between 29 and 32 weeks gestation, mortality has shown a significant reduction. Overall, requirements for oxygen therapy and ventilation have shown a threefold increase, while hours in receipt of continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) have increased sevenfold.

Explore related subjects

EnglandFetal Organ MaturityGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornLungMeconium Aspiration SyndromeRespiration DisordersRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornRespiratory Tract InfectionsJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D J Field, A D Milner, I E Hopkin, R J Madeley. Changing patterns in neonatal respiratory diseases.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.1950030407

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Health inequalities in Scotland and England: the contrasting journeys of ideas from research into policy.

Both the UK's Labour Government and Scotland's devolved Labour-Liberal Democrat coalition Executive have committed themselves to reducing health inequalities. Furthermore, both institutions have emphasised the importance of using evidence to inform policy responses. In light of such political commitments, a significant amount of work has been undertaken in the field of health inequalities in order to: (i) review the available research evidence; (ii) assess the extent to which policies have been based on this research evidence; and (iii) evaluate the success (or failure) of policies to tackle health inequalities. Yet so far only limited attention has been given to exploring how key actors involved in research-policy dialogues understand the processes involved. In an attempt to address this gap, this article draws on data from semi-structured interviews with 58 key actors in the field of health inequalities research and policymaking in the UK to argue that it is ideas, rather than research evidence, which have travelled from research into policy. The descriptions of the varying journeys of these ideas fit three types--successful, partial and fractured--each of which is outlined with reference to one example. The paper then employs existing theories about research-policy relations and the movement of ideas in an attempt to illuminate and better understand the contrasting journeys. In the concluding discussion, it is argued that the third approach, which focuses on the entrepreneurial processes involved in the marketing of ideas, is most helpful in understanding the research findings, but that this needs to be discussed in relation to the political context within which negotiations take place.

England↗