PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3666348

Improving communication between general practitioners and specialists.

Abstract

An investigation was carried out in the Almelo district in the Netherlands to study referral problems and to improve communication and cooperation between general practitioners and specialists in the area. During September and October 1984 seven general practitioners referred 30 patients to internists. There appeared to be considerable disagreement between general practitioners and internists about the necessity of the referrals from a biomedical view point and less so about the objective of the referrals. Twelve referrals were labelled as 'problem referrals'. Each of these was reviewed by the general practitioner and the internist who were involved in the referral in the presence of the author. In these meetings agreement was reached on the objective and the necessity of each of the 12 referrals. The evaluation, however, showed marked differences between general practitioners and internists with respect to the effect of the project: most general practitioners said that participation in the study influenced their conduct in referring patients to specialists, while most internists replied negatively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Doeleman. 1987. Improving communication between general practitioners and specialists.. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra%2F4.3.176

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗