PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3720254

Quality control and quality assurance.

Abstract

The office laboratory's need for quality is no different from that of any other clinical laboratory. If patients are to receive the benefit of physician's office testing, reliable, high-quality laboratory results are essential. To achieve this, the physician's office laboratory must have an adequate quality assurance program. Several fundamental components of such a program have been addressed in this article: procedure manuals, record-keeping, maintenance logs, quality control charts, participation in proficiency testing, and laboratory inspection. If your state's regulations do not yet require these activities in the physician's office laboratory, they soon will! A successful laboratory's quality assurance program will provide the following assurances. (1) Quality practices are established and followed by all personnel involved with the testing in the laboratory. (2) The technologist performing the test will know when systems and instruments are working properly and the patients' results are reliable. (3) High-quality information needed by the physician interpreting or evaluating patient laboratory results will be generated. (4) A set of written records is available demonstrating to the inspector that uniform and acceptable protocols have been established and are practiced in the laboratory. One short article cannot provide all the specifics for a laboratory's quality assurance program. The manufacturers and suppliers of instruments and reagents should be able to provide support in the following areas: calibration, type of controls to be used, development of a control chart, required maintenance procedures, establishment of accuracy and precision, and troubleshooting. If they cannot or will not, your laboratory should, perhaps, consider an alternative vendor to supply instrumentation and/or reagents. Additionally, resources such as the professional organizations, consultants, other clinical laboratories, and the inspectors or certifying agencies should also be considered in developing a comprehensive quality assurance program.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R H Laessig, S S Ehrmeyer, D J Hassemer. 1986. Quality control and quality assurance.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3720254/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI): an appraisal of validity in an outpatient sample.

In this study we examined the validity of the Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI) using outpatient participants. The ADI Depression scale (Dep) was compared to three other measures used to assess depression: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS), and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Correlations between the ADI and these three measures were significant. An analysis of the discriminant ability of the ADI Dep scale resulted in sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive power, negative predictive power, hit rate, and area under the curve (92.3%) that were supportive of the scale's effectiveness. The ADI Feigning scale (Fg) was compared to the six PAI validity scales. The Fg scale correlated significantly with the PAI Negative Impression Management (NIM) and Positive Impression Management (PIM) scales, and the Malingering (MAL) and Defensive (DEF) indexes. Directionality was as would be predicted. The ADI did not correlate with the two PAI validity scales derived by discriminant analysis function.

Ambulatory Care↗

How normalised is HIV care in the UK? A survey of current practice and opinion.

OBJECTIVES: The prognosis for individuals infected with HIV has changed dramatically over the past 10 years, with patients living longer and requiring other specialist services. It is apparent that access of other healthcare professionals to clinical information about a patient's HIV care differs between centres in the UK. Lack of awareness of an individual's HIV status may compromise their clinical care. AIM: To establish current practice and identify the views of clinicians caring for patients infected with HIV. METHODS: Lead consultants in all genitourinary medicine departments in the UK were invited to complete a questionnaire regarding use of combined HIV and hospital notes and ability of general practitioners and other hospital specialists to access information about individual patient's HIV care. Clinician's opinions on the "normalisation" of HIV management were also sought. RESULTS: Combined notes (outpatient and inpatient) were used by 12% (16/130) of respondents. The patient's identifying number was used to request blood tests in 86%. Of the respondents, 42% had encountered difficulties in communication that affected delivery of care for an HIV-positive patient. CONCLUSIONS: Centres using combined notes identified a higher frequency of communication with other doctors and specialties, suggesting a higher standard of care. Physicians involved in HIV care should consider combining patients' HIV and hospital notes for improved clinical care.

Ambulatory Care↗