PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3734300

Evaluating the evidence for nutrition interventions: two algorithms.

Abstract

Community and clinical dietitians are increasingly involved in choosing interventions to alleviate problems and in evaluating programs for their effectiveness. Two decision trees have been developed to assist program planners in this process. The first addresses whether or not a pilot project should be recommended. It deals with determining whether a sufficient problem exists to warrant an intervention, and whether an appropriate intervention that will make a difference can be provided. The second algorithm is directed at the question of whether an existing program should be continued or expanded. It is concerned not only with the outcome of the program but also with its cost-effectiveness.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L M Lopez. 1986. Evaluating the evidence for nutrition interventions: two algorithms.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3734300/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.

This review summarizes key factors that have interfered with translation of research to practice and what public health researchers can do to hasten such transfer, focusing on characteristics of interventions, target settings, and research designs. The need to address context and to utilize research, review, and reporting practices that address external validity issues-such as designs that focus on replication, and practical clinical and behavioral trials-are emphasized. Although there has been increased emphasis on social-ecological interventions that go beyond the individual level, interventions often address each component as if it were an independent intervention. Greater attention is needed to connectedness across program levels and components. Finally, examples are provided of evaluation models and current programs that can help accelerate translation of research to practice and policy.

Decision Making, Organizational↗