PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3745662

Suppression and (2f1-f2)-difference tones in a nonlinear cochlear preprocessing model with active feedback.

Abstract

The two nonlinear effects of two-tone suppression and of (2f1-f2)-difference tone creation are measured in a hardware model which consists of 90 sections containing nonlinear feedback loops. The basic data are the level and phase distributions along the 90 sections produced by single tones in the linear passive system which are almost identical to those produced in the nonlinear active system at high levels. Enhancement is created at medium and low input levels resulting in more strongly peaked level-place patterns. Two-tone suppression is, therefore, described as a "de-enhancement" which is produced by the gain reduction in the saturating nonlinearity of the feedback loop in consequence of increasing input levels (that of the feedback loop in consequence of increasing input levels (that of the suppressor as well!). Characteristics of suppression are given in normalized form. The creation of (2f1-f2)-difference tones is based on the same nonlinear effects. In each section, difference-tone wavelets are created which travel--changing level and phase thereby--to their characteristic place, where they add up to a vector sum corresponding to the audible difference tone. In case of cancellation, the vector sum has to be compensated by an additional tone of the same frequency and amount but opposite phase. Based on this strategy of (2f1-f2)-difference tone development, the relevant relations are measured on the model and averaged either in normalized graphs or in equations in order to offer the possibility to simulate the hardware model on the computer. Psychoacoustically measured cancellation data are compared with data measured using the model. The two data sets agree not only in general but also in many details indicating that the model describes cochlear nonlinear preprocessing to a useful approximation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Zwicker. 1986. Suppression and (2f1-f2)-difference tones in a nonlinear cochlear preprocessing model with active feedback.. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.394177

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Possible modulation of auditory middle latency responses by nitric oxide in the inferior colliculus of anaesthetized rats.

Nitric oxide (NO) is a short-lived radical species endowed with intercellular signalling functions in the mammalian brain. In the present study we have investigated the effects of focal injection into one inferior colliculus of N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, on the acoustic middle latency responses (MLRs) evoked by click stimuli and recorded from the auditory cortex in anaesthetized rats. Microinfusion of L-NAME (1.0 mM) did not alter the latency of MLRs nor did it affect the evoked brain stem responses (ABRs). By contrast, L-NAME reduced P1a-N1 amplitude of MLRs by 51.7 +/- 6.6% (mean +/- SEM; n = 5) and almost complete recovery to background amplitude was obtained 15-25 min after treatment. The less active isomer, D-NAME (1.0 mM; n = 5), failed to produce consistent effects on the evoked MLRs. A higher concentration of L-NAME (5.0 mM; n = 5) yielded a 69.0 +/- 13.3% inhibition whereas maximum inhibition produced by 0.5 mM (n = 3) L-NAME was approximately equal to 10% of control value. The inhibitory effect typically evoked by 1.0 mM L-NAME was prevented by treating rats with L-arginine (5.0 mM; n = 5), the endogenous precursor of NO synthesis. Reduction of MLR amplitude was also obtained in rats receiving intracollicular injection of dizocilpine (MK801; 1.0 microM) and LY274614 (1.0 mM), two selective N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists. In conclusion, the present data support a role for intracollicular NO in the processing and transmission of the acoustic input to the auditory cortex in the rat.

Acoustic Stimulation

Reaction time and acoustic startle in normal human subjects.

We studied the effects of collision between a voluntary command and the startle response by interrupting a simple visual reaction time task with an acoustic startle. We observed two main effects. First, the reaction time was markedly shortened when the startle was delivered at intervals of 0-75 ms after the 'go' signal. Second, the startle response elicited when the subject's attention was focused onto reacting to the visual 'go' signal involved more muscles and induced larger EMG responses than when the startling stimulus was delivered unexpectedly. Startle response and voluntary commands may share a number of structures along the motor path. Reaction time can be shortened up to the latency of a startle response if the voluntary command is issued a short time after the startling stimulus. Facilitation of the startle responses during motor preparation may be due to the excitability enhancement that occurs in various neural structures along the motor path before the onset of EMG activity.

Acoustic Stimulation

Protection against noise trauma by sound conditioning in the guinea pig appears not to be mediated by the middle ear muscles.

The aim of this study was to test whether the middle ear muscles (MEM) play a significant role in the phenomenon of sound conditioning in guinea pigs. After inducing a temporary threshold shift by noise exposure (2767 Hz tone, 103 dB SPL, 5 min), the magnitude and duration of loss, as well as the rate of recovery of the amplitude of the distortion product emission was determined at 1.75, 2.2, 2.8, and 3.5 kHz followed for 90 min post-exposure for (1) a sound conditioned group with intact MEM, and (2) a sound conditioned group with paralyzed MEM. Significant differences were not found for any of the distortion product parameters tested. The results suggest that the MEM do not significantly contribute to protection against noise trauma by sound conditioning.

Acoustic Stimulation