PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3749888

Nucleosome structure.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H P Erickson. 1986-09-26. Nucleosome structure.. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3749888

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Quantitation of supercoiled DNA cleavage in nonradioactive DNA: application to ionizing radiation and synthetic endonuclease cleavage.

Quantitation of the conversion of nonradioactive supercoiled DNA to its open circular or linear forms on ethidium-stained electrophoretic gels has been difficult because of differential binding of ethidium to supercoiled DNA vs other forms under different conditions and the nonlinear response of photographic film. We have developed methods for adding a linear DNA as an internal fluorescence standard to "normalize" the quantity of DNA loaded into each lane of a gel. Inclusion of a linear normalizing DNA in samples before partitioning for individual supercoil cleavage reactions allows the quantitation of the resultant species, is technically easy, and does not require quantitative application of the sample to the gel. If the presence of a normalizing DNA during supercoil cleavage is undesirable, the addition of a normalizing plasmid to each sample after supercoil cleavage (but before electrophoresis) or the quantitative application of samples containing test DNA alone to the gel gives similar data, but with increased variability. We use the normalizing DNA method in cleavage by a physical agent (ionizing radiation) and in a more complex situation, by a protein-based, light-dependent synthetic endonuclease. We show how the fraction of intact supercoiled DNA can be calculated from measurement of the cleaved and normalizing species only. The method also can be used in reactions involving the depletion of one DNA species, whether supercoiled or not, such as protein-DNA interactions as detected by gel retardation assays.

DNA, Superhelical

Imaging and nanodissection of individual supercoiled plasmids by atomic force microscopy.

The atomic force microscope (AFM) was used to image supercoiled plasmid DNA deposited on a mica surface in either a hydrated or desiccated state. Hydrated plasmid was precisely cut by the scanning tip at a location determined by the instrument operator. Small pieces of DNA (100-150 nm in length) were excised and deposited adjacent to the dissected plasmid, demonstrating that it is possible to remove and manipulate genomic DNA fragments, unresolvable by light microscopy, from defined chromosomal locations by AFM.

DNA, Superhelical

Torsional rigidity of positively and negatively supercoiled DNA.

Time-correlated single-photon counting of intercalated ethidium bromide was used to measure the torsion constants of positively supercoiled, relaxed, and negatively supercoiled pBR322 DNA, which range in superhelix density from +0.042 to -0.123. DNA behaves as coupled, nonlinear torsional pendulums under superhelical stress, and the anharmonic term in the Hamiltonian is approximately 15 percent for root-mean-square fluctuations in twist at room temperature. At the level of secondary structure, positively supercoiled DNA is significantly more flexible than negatively supercoiled DNA. These results exclude certain models that account for differential binding affinity of proteins to positively and negatively supercoiled DNA.

DNA, Superhelical