PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 379357

Composite resection without mandibular reconstruction.

Abstract

While composite resection remains the fundamental surgical approach to carcinoma of the posterior oral cavity, removal or reconstruction of the adjacent segment of mandible remains contentious. Various grafts have been used with less than satisfactory and unpredictable results. Bone has been brought in, borrowed, reshaped, and implanted into the area of mandibular deficit; mandibular osteotomy has been attempted with primary closure as well. A review of 78 composite resections at Upstate Medical Center reveals that of this number, 61 have undergone primary lateral mandibulectomy without reconstruction while four others have undergone more extended resection without reconstruction at the time of initial surgery. In the others, mandibular reconstruction has been unsatisfactory; mandibular osteotomy in the presence of irradiated tissue has been unsuccessful in all cases. In our experience, satisfactory results, functionally and cosmetically, have been attained with partial mandibulectomy and primary closure of the wound obviating more involved reconstructive procedures. A review of therapy with attention to surgical detail, complications, and results is presented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Leipzig, J T Johnson, D D Rabuzzi. 1979. Composite resection without mandibular reconstruction.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/379357/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Second-hand bones?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Bone Transplantation

[Reconstruction of the mandible using a vascularized graft from the iliac bone].

Twelve vascularized iliac crest free-tissue transfers were used for oromandibular reconstruction, 2 as osteocutaneous and 10 as osseous flaps. Two patients had preoperative radiotherapy. Nine of the 12 reconstruction were carried out primarily, following radical surgery for oral cancer. One graft was lost by venous thrombosis. Evidence of bone union was noted in 11 patients, and no pseudoarthrosis was observed. The main advantage of this method is the availability of a large bloc of living composite tissue and both the functional and cosmetic results should be improved in patients undergoing resection of the anterior part of the mandible.

Bone Transplantation